Wikipedia:Featured article review/Căile Ferate Române/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by Joelr31 14:49, 24 May 2009.

FAR commentary

 * ''Wikiprojects and nom notified.

FAils 1c. Very few citations.  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 02:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Images
 * File:Viaduct Oravita Anina.jpg, File:Oravita railway bridge.jpg, File:Gara de Nord train board.jpg, File:CFR accelerat train.jpg, File:CFR new doubledecker car.jpg, File:CFR Rapid train.jpg, File:CFR refurbished salon coach.jpg, File:Romanian InterCity train 1.jpg, File:CFR InterCity 2nd-class salon 3.jpg, File:CFR desiro3.jpg, File:CFR new sleeper.jpg, File:CFR class 41 red locomotive.jpg, File:CFR class 46 locomotive.jpg, File:CFR class 62 locomotive.jpg, File:CFR class 63 locomotive.jpg, File:CFR class 65 locomotive.jpg, File:CFR class 82 locomotive.jpg, File:CFR class 77 DMU.jpg, File:CFR desiro5.jpg, File:CFR class 91 DMU.jpg: The relationship between the copyright holder and uploader is unclear. Has Ronline contacted them all and gained permission? The source appears to be the Railfaneurope.net Picture Gallery but I don't see anywhere on that site that licenses pictures as CC or GFDL or PD. In fact, commercial use is explicitly forbidden . How the copyright holders have released rights needs to be more explicit.
 * File:Gara de nord foto by Nimrod Kamer.jpg was uploaded by User:Marina T. but it is by "Nimrod Kamer". Marina T. is indefinitely blocked for chronic violations of image copyright and there are innumerable problem images associated with that account (see User talk:Marina T.).
 * File:CFR headquarters.jpg: no author information
 * File:Sageata albastra in pitesti station.jpg: no author or source
 * File:CFR agentia de voiaj.jpg: apparently uploaded by "an unknown user", so how can it be GFDL?
 * It is unnecessary to show the logo twice. DrKiernan (talk) 12:52, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

FARC commentary

 * Suggested FA criteria concern is citations, copyright. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources.  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! '') 01:30, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delist  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 05:28, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 12:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist no work done on image copyrights or verification. DrKiernan (talk) 12:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.