Wikipedia:Featured article review/Chromatophore/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 0:56, 15 May 2015 (UTC).

Chromatophore

 * Notified: Rockpocket, WP Cephalopods, WP Animal anatomy, WP Molecular and Cellular Biology
 * URFA nom

Review section
This is a 2006 promotion that has not been maintained to standards; see talk page notice from March 2015. There are problems beyond the lack of citations, which I will list if someone engages to improve the article. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 18:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello. I wrote the original content back in 2006. I don't think it is too far away from FA, but sadly agree that it does not meet current standards and its narrative flow has suffered from piecemeal development over the years. I unfortunately do not have the time to maintain this myself these days, but would be very willing to assist as much as I could if anyone wishes to take it on. Rockpock  e  t  20:44, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Move to FARC. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 20:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

FARC section

 * Concerns raised in the review section largely concerned referencing. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:55, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Nikkimaria (talk) 00:56, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delist DragonZero  ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 04:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delist, no improvements. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 19:44, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delist. Unsourced sentences/paragraphs. Prose could be tightened, for example "It has been demonstrated..." occurs three times in three successive paragraphs and there is a mixture of spelling variants: organize/organise; cell signalling but sulfur bacteria, etc. DrKiernan (talk) 20:26, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.