Wikipedia:Featured article review/Civil Air Patrol/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed 19:21, 15 March 2008.

Review commentary

 * Notified User:Linuxbeak, User:Scetoaux, User:Huntster, User:OuroborosCobra, User:VigilancePrime, User:JColgan, User:Bishonen, WikiProject Military history, WikiProject Aviation

Article severely fails 2(c), with great swathes of the text uncited. There are a number of tags and at least one weblink embedded in the text. Article also fails 1(a), there is a style tag towards the end of the article, untidy formatting of sections and examples of poor prose throughout the text. Other problems include a "media" section which has the hallmarks of an "In popular culture" list and the length of the thing; at 71kb with several huge blocks of text, it could probably stand to be branched off into sub-articles.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. This article does indeed need much more citing. Buckshot06 (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. The article needs additional structure and citation, as noted above.  I'll try to help with the refs next week. --BizMgr (talk) 04:29, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

FARC commentary

 * Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c) and prose (1a). Marskell (talk) 16:32, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Remove per criterion 1c. LuciferMorgan (talk) 00:47, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Remove as it fails to meet citation criteria. Cromdog (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Nothing happening on the article but vandal reverts. Not a terrible page, but clear citation and structure issues, as noted above. Removing. Marskell (talk) 19:17, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.