Wikipedia:Featured article review/Damon Hill/archive1

Damon Hill
Someone mentioned on the Michael Schumacher talk page that "The entire article is nothing more than POV, fan-boyism, and complete fabrication of reality, only occcassional punctuated by a factual date or location." Why they've put this in the Michael Schumacher talk page I've no idea. They also seem very vulgar and uninterested in what people have to say in respones, so they might have been messing about. I thought it was best to at least put this up for FAR. Buc 11:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


 * This concern doesn't seem to have been raised at Talk:Damon Hill; I'm not sure how we review an article based on "someone somewhere said something?" It might be more helpful to ask the critical editor to place verification tags on any content s/he disagrees with, and to discuss the issue on the article talk page. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 14:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Review closed by Joelr31; concerns can be addressed on talk page first. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 16:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)