Wikipedia:Featured article review/Eifel Aqueduct/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by User:Marskell 11:34, 26 August 2008.

Review commentary

 * Notified WP Germany and WP Architecture, principle editor no longer active.

A 2004 promotion, this article is lacking citations and needs a MOS tuneup and images check. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 04:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Untouched since nominated, move to FARC. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 22:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

FARC commentary

 * Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c), MoS (2), and images (3). Marskell (talk) 13:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * In my view, the only suspect image is Image:Logo roemerkanal wanderweg.jpg, which may come under the guidance at Logos. DrKiernan (talk) 13:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * When the article first came up for review, I searched my architecture and ancient history books for references and found none. The web seems to have nothing either, although my searching talents are pathetically lacking as I am a book person. Could it possibly have a more common alternative name? &mdash; Mattisse  (Talk) 17:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * One hit on Google Books for "Eiffel Aqueduct", nine for "Eifel Aqueduct". Jappalang (talk) 22:27, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Remove per lack of citations. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 18:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Remove, very few citations. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:42, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.