Wikipedia:Featured article review/Electronic amplifier/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed 17:14, 22 August 2007.

Review commentary

 * Messages left at Light current, Omegatron, GRAHAMUK, Heron, Dicklyon and WP Electronics

Electronic amplifier is a brilliant prose holdover. It offers a menu of defiencies wrt WP:WIAFA. The WP:LEAD is inadequate, contains a list, and has no image (which shouldn't be that hard to obtain). The article has numerous listy and shorty, choppy sections. The article is largely uncited and is tagged as needing cleanup. It has WP:MOS deficiencies including WP:DASH and WP:MOSBOLD. Sample prose, "The different methods of supplying power result in many different methods of bias." Sandy Georgia (Talk) 22:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * It certainly needs work. I don't think it should be a featured article at this point in time. — Omegatron 00:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

FARC commentary

 * Suggested FA criteria concerns are LEAD (2a), stub sections and MoS issues (2), prose (1a), and images (3). Marskell 13:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Remove Mostly uncited with stubby sections and overly listy sections. If the factual accuracy dispute has merit, then, based on the edit history, the incorrect information has not been removed and omitted information has not been added. Jay32183 21:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan 00:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Remove—1c, 1a. For example, the first "It" is unclear. Hyphen in "real world amplifiers". Commas required. List as half the lead? Tony 00:12, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.