Wikipedia:Featured article review/Flag of the Republic of China/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed 12:58, 20 August 2007.

Review commentary

 * Wikiproject China has been notified
 * Messages left at WP Taiwan, WP Hearaldy and vex, Neutrality, Jiang, Darobsta and Roadrunner

I want this featured article reviewed because: Cheers--Hadseys 00:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * No references
 * Red links
 * Uncompelling prose
 * And an empty external links section


 * Hadseys, please note the instructions at the top of the WP:FAR page regarding nomination of one article at a time, and please follow the instructions to notify relevant parties on both of your nominations. Thanks, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 01:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)  Did it myself.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 02:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I'll tackle this. I checked the article; there is only one red link and that is to a building. I can just delink it. I personally think that many of the references there now should be the external links. I notice there is some (fact) templates running around, I can address those. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 02:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It should be trivially easy to scare up tons of references via the LexisNexis news database, and Google scholar. It's just a matter of, who has the time?Ling.Nut 04:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I got the time to fix some things up. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 04:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment Redlinks and lack of external links are not deficiencies per WP:WIAFA. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 05:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok; but I removed them anyways and I think the three links we have now are good for now. While sourcing is easy to do, prose isn't my best attribute. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 05:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Zscout, please update your progress regularly, and don't be alarmed if you aren't able to complete work within the two-week FAR period; even if the article moves to FARC, extra time is allowed as long as work is ongoing and progress is evident. A lot of citation work is needed. I've seen other articles use under the images in the lead, but I'm not aware if there are guidelines; it might be helpful to see that up front. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 19:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

FARC commentary

 * Suggested FA criteria concerns are citations (1c) and prose (1a). Marskell 13:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Status? No progress since nom; is anyone planning to work on this?  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 20:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan 17:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Remove—1a and 1c. Needs a thorough copy-edit to smooth out awkward wording. Tony 23:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.