Wikipedia:Featured article review/Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles and Fundamental Duties of India/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC).

Fundamental Rights, Directive Principles and Fundamental Duties of India

 * Notified: Shreshth91, WikiProject Indian Law , WikiProject India , WikiProject Politics , 2021-05-19 talk page

Review section
I am nominating this featured article for review because there are quite a few serious issues with this article in compliance with current FA criteria. Per the issues raised at the talk page by @, and no major edits being made to resolve the concerns, I have created this review page. This article has lot of original research, random text is underlined, and only three major sources are used, with only one of them being a legal scholar. This also leads to be believe that the article is not as comprehensive as required for present FA standards. The "Criticism and analysis" section has random examples and laws listed, with no discussion as of how they are directly related with the topic. It has few vague sentences like "Children are now unemployed in hazardous environments, but their employment in hazardous jobs, prevalently as domestic help, violates the spirit of the constitution in the eyes of many critics and human rights advocates." (emphasis mine) and "Most of the fundamental rights are violated in courtrooms in either criminal cases or civil cases". The prose has few issues with linking and MOS. Needs a lot of work at present. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * MOS:DOCTOR and holy cow with underlining of text in mainspace (I think I removed all the underlining, but this shows it is not a well-watched article). Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  16:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Move to FARC, no engagement, no improvement. diff since FAR initiated Sandy Georgia (Talk)  01:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Move to FARC per Sandy (t &#183; c)  buidhe  21:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Move to FARC, nothing happening. Hog Farm Talk 15:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

FARC section

 * Issues raised in the review section include prose, neutrality and sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:48, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Nikkimaria (talk) 03:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delist per above (t &#183; c)  buidhe  14:09, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delist. Tagged for original research. DrKay (talk) 13:42, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delist: I have serious concerns about comprehensiveness, original research, and more. (Honestly, it seems this whole article may be synthesis: do any reliable sources treat these three sections – and just these three sections – of the Constitution as being a distinct entity?) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delist - needs rewritten from top to bottom, almost. Also evidentally completely allowed to fall by the wayside - this spam link addition survived for a few months, as well as that dreadful underlining Sandy removed. Hog Farm Talk 19:39, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.