Wikipedia:Featured article review/Halloween III: Season of the Witch/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by Nikkimaria 23:51, 17 June 2012.

Review commentary

 * Notified: dream out loud, goolcap, williamJE, Simon Peter Hughes, marnetteD, WikiProject Horror, WikiProject Film, WikiProject Science Fiction

I am nominating this featured article for review because of concerns of from the article talk page: I'm not involved with this article or Michael Myers-related. However, the post was added in October 2011, and seven months have passed without issues resolved, as I checked the history page, and with maintenance banners still standing. --George Ho (talk) 18:16, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I would have to agree that the article does not meet the criteria to be Featured. It's not a bad article but the reasons for it not qualifying for Featured Article status are clearly listed above. I would say that what it most badly needs is more references from published books.
 * Incidentally, all the edits that I made to the page were purely cosmetic.--Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 11:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Besides a couple of one-sentence paragraphs, the prose doesn't look too bad. However, some sections such as "Box office" and "Poster artwork" look rather short.
 * The links to WatchTheMagicPumpkin.com should probably be removed.
 * The citation format is very ambiguous. "So forth and so on, quoted at X" is not the proper way to do it.
 * Many citations to IMDb that should be replaced.

Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:39, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

FARC commentary

 * Concerns listed in the review section include issues related to sourcing, prose and images. Dana boomer (talk) 13:54, 29 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delist, nothing's happening. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?)
 * Delist for now. Needs another peer review the next time the content has improved. I will put one of non-free images under review for NFCC. Also, someone has reverted the article back to what it was when the article was nominated as a Featured Article, yet some tweaks were made. Nevertheless, no substantial improvement was made. --George Ho (talk) 22:12, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delist: No issues were addressed, and the article clearly does not meet FACR, anymore.  TRLIJC19   (  talk  ) 01:22, 17 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.