Wikipedia:Featured article review/Irish Houses of Parliament/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by User:Marskell 16:42, 25 September 2008.

Review commentary

 * Messages left at User talk:Jtdirl and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ireland‎

The number of unreviewed FAs with zero inline citations is now down to about ten. Here is one from early '04. (Looking at the FAC I can't tell who originally nommed.) Along with the obvious 1c issue, I was hoping someone who understands the image rules could go through this as it has a great many pics. The ToC headlines need to be shortened and made less conversational. Marskell (talk) 14:54, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Agree with everything said above by, another good FAR candidate - this article is not up to WP:GA or WP:FA standards. Cirt (talk) 17:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

See above list of images currently used in this article. Cirt (talk) 17:38, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Images
 * Image:Irish Parliament.jpg - Possible candidate to be moved to Wikimedia Commons, could use more source info however.
 * Image:Hoflentrance.jpg - Should be moved to Commons, with full source info filled out.
 * Image:Hoflchand1.jpg - Should be moved to Commons, with full source info filled out.
 * Image:Hofcent1-crop.jpg - Should be moved to Commons, with full source info filled out.
 * Image:Pthcceiling.jpg - Should be moved to Commons, with full source info filled out.
 * Image:Bofihofl.jpg - Already on Commons.
 * Image:Bofiboyne.jpg - Should be moved to Commons, with full source info filled out.
 * Image:Woolsack-crop.jpg - Possible candidate to be moved to Commons - however owner agreed to photograph is not sufficient - requires permission/verification through OTRS.
 * Image:IrishHC1780.jpg - Already on Commons.
 * Image:College-green-aerial-thumbnail.jpg - Possible candidate to be moved to Commons - however owner of shot emailed full permission is not sufficient - requires permission/verification through OTRS.
 * Image:Ihopcurved.jpg - Should be moved to Commons, with full source info filled out.
 * All images not already on Commons have been moved except #1 & #10. ww2censor (talk) 04:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree that this article has some major flaws, especially with the aesthetics of the images. There are also only two references (though not cited) on the topic). I also feel that this page should also cover some of the history that happened within its walls, and not just the walls themselves. A rough example of this can be found here. Ottava Rima (talk) 18:51, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the image work guys. And yes, I had had the same thought Ottava: should this solely be an architecture page or should it also cover history? Marskell (talk) 09:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I dont see this as an issue, as long as the orginisation is correct. Anyway they are intertwined.
 * Articles on paintings are able to cover provenance/style/influences/influence, and all are all closely related, and I don't see a difference here. Ceoil  sláinte 00:17, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

FARC commentary

 * Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c) and images (3). Marskell (talk) 15:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Remove 1c. Note that the "modern view" section also reads like a pundit's voice, rather than telling us who thinks what and why, it seems like wikipedia's POV/verdict.  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket ) 07:26, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Remove - Agree with, and per my comments above. Cirt (talk) 07:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Remove - I have to agree. ww2censor (talk) 15:28, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Remove 1c. Ceoil  sláinte 21:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Remove per 1c. Complete lack of inline citations for references means that this article does not pass today's FA criteria.  JEdgarFreeman (talk) 12:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.