Wikipedia:Featured article review/Jay Chou/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Maralia via FACBot (talk) 4:02, 28 April 2015 (UTC).

Jay Chou

 * Notified: SeleneFN, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Taiwan, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rock music, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pop music

Review section
I am nominating this featured article for review because I feel like it no longer meets FA criteria. There are whole sections and paragraphs that are completely unsourced, and random sentences that aren't sourced. And the sources that are there do not seem reliable to me. Not something I would consider a FA. LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Delist. I'm utterly confused as to why until now it wasn't nominated to be delisted. I support your nomination to delist this article, it would need months of work at least to bring it back to FA standard. I can only think of looking in google books to find any of this unsourced information, but that's about it. Burklemore1 (talk) 07:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * , please review the instructions at WP:FAR. The article is nominated for review; Keep or Delist are declared when/if it moves to the FARC section.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 13:36, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * : Oops, I misread. Thanks for the letting me know. :-) Burklemore1 (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delist article. Clean-up banners automatically qualify for delisting. Besides, some of the references are not reliable.  CookieMonster755   (talk)   20:35, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * , please read the FAR instructions and the comments on this page just above yours. Your declaration won't be considered at this stage. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 21:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Move to FARC. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 21:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

FARC section

 * Concerns raised in the review section largely centred on referencing. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Maralia (talk) 14:02, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delist. Currently in multiple clean up categories: articles lacking reliable references, articles needing additional references, articles with dead external links from September 2010, articles with unsourced statements from January and April 2015, and BLP articles lacking sources. DrKiernan (talk) 08:24, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delist, no one working on improving deficiences. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 14:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delist DragonZero  ( Talk  ·  Contribs ) 04:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.