Wikipedia:Featured article review/Layla/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by User:Dana boomer 17:01, 9 February 2013‎.

Review commentary

 * Notified: Y2kcrazyjoker4, Deltabeignet, SummerPhD

There is uncited information about living people in this article, even if BLP may not apply to this song. Other non-BLP information needs references. George Ho (talk) 04:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Littered with tags, not sure if YouTube can be a RS, inconsistent citing. --Rschen7754 02:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Youtube is no longer reliable, but, if not copyvio, can be legitimate external link . --George Ho (talk) 03:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Turns out that instrumental, orchestral versions were performed in 1980. I tried to find albums released in 1980s, but no luck. Only ones are recent years, like 1997 and 2010s(?). --George Ho (talk) 05:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * And there are two bare urls that need completing. Chris857 (talk) 04:05, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * bare URLs into citation formats by using templates. --George Ho (talk) 05:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I will work on it. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 13:19, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * There are no BLP issues because that information is included in Boyd's autobiography. I made a quick search and found a lot of sources. I removed one rather off-topic comment in the first section. The only issue are the missing pages for some books. I will try to find a solution for that. Regards.--Tomcat (7) 13:50, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Improvements were made. Still, Youtube is used, and I can't find reliable sources that determine existence of live orchestral performances. --George Ho (talk) 16:01, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

FARC commentary

 * Featured article criteria mentioned in the review section include sourcing and BLP concerns. Dana boomer (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delist - Per its sourcing issues. GamerPro64  04:01, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delist per sourcing and BLP concerns. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:28, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delist unless some quick and serious improvements are made regarding:
 * Peacock wording, e.g. "an unmistakable guitar figure" and "famously contrasting movements", just in the first paragraph.
 * Lack of citations, particularly in the legacy section and chart performance table. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:52, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Dana boomer (talk) 22:01, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.