Wikipedia:Featured article review/Prince-elector/archive1

Prince-elector

 * Article is no longer a featured article

Review commentary

 * Messages left at User talk:Lord Emsworth, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Middle Ages, and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Middle Ages/Featured. Sandy 17:18, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

This article got featured the end of 2004, when the criteria for FAC were much more loose. As you can see, the article lacks sufficient references, lacks inline citations and has too many red links. I think it should be reviewed.--Yannismarou 14:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

My opinions are the same as the nominator. All the concerns expressed above need to be addressed. Criterion 1. c. isn't met at the moment. LuciferMorgan 15:05, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

I donot see any response from the initial nominator or anybody else. i'm sorry but it looks like an old abandonned FA.--Yannismarou 12:26, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

The days pass and nobody is interested in this article!--Yannismarou 19:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


 * It is rather sad that no-one seems to care about Lord Emsworth's many featured articles. See his user page for some more possible FAR(C) candidates. -- ALoan (Talk) 20:35, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

FARC commentary

 * Suggested FA criteria concerns are references and inline citations. Joelito (talk) 15:50, 11 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Remove Not featured quality. Punctured Bicycle 17:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Remove Fails criterion 1. c. LuciferMorgan 22:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Remove Per above. My concerns not addressed.--Yannismarou 17:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Remove Complete lack of inline citations, concerns not addressed, no one working on it. Sandy 15:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Post-deletion commentary

 * Someone mentioned here that "inline cite requirement is not applied to FAs that passed before that requirement took hold." Was this article unfairly removed? -- Stbalbach 15:52, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * At this writing the article is not FA standard, whether or not it was in 2004. Let's work on improving it and re-nominating. -- Rob C (Alarob) 17:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)