Wikipedia:Featured article review/Suburbs of Johannesburg/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by Marskell 17:27, 12 August 2009.

Review commentary

 * wikiprojects notified. Author has retired

This article has a severe lack of citations, and many subjective comments describing schools/places as "prestigious" etc are not cited.  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) paid editing=POV 14:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Images need alt text as per WP:ALT. Eubulides (talk) 20:42, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

FARC commentary

 * Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, alt text, POV. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. FAQ?  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) paid editing=POV 01:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 04:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist per self  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) paid editing=POV 07:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist On top of the above, the article is out of date - it mentions and relies upon a system of 11 numbered regions which no longer exists - it was reorganised in 2006 into 7 lettered regions. Orderinchaos 04:39, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist on Orderinchaos' grounds alone, but there's plenty to find non FA-worthy in this article. JKBrooks85 (talk) 06:44, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist per concerns.  Aaroncrick  ( talk ) 10:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delist per  YellowMonkey . Also, article has not been edited in the last three months. And only 2 edits last May. &mdash; mattisse  (Talk) 16:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.