Wikipedia:Featured article review/Surface weather analysis/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 4:49, 5 February 2022 (UTC).

Surface weather analysis

 * Notified: Thegreatdr, MiamiProf, Runningonbrains, Tmangray, WikiProject Weather, talk page notification 2021-12-04

Review section
I am nominating this featured article for review because there are large swaths of unsourced text. There is also plenty of more recent academic literature that needs to be incorporated. The article's history section is 20 years outdated. Surely something has happened since 2001. Lastly, the article needs a thorough copy edit to fix numerous Grammar issues. Noah Talk 22:43, 1 January 2022 (UTC)


 * This article is part of Contributor copyright investigations/WikiProject Tropical cyclones (see page 3), and based on what I found at the Tornado FAR, it is likely to have unattributed copying within and unattributed public domain text. There are no  templates on talk, and no  templates in the article. As an example, this edit did have unattributed public domain text, so the article will need a thorough check. This is not an insurmountable problem; it just requires time to check and add the necessary attributions (see the sample at the Tornado FAR) to make sure the article complies with WP:WIAFA 1f.  If someone intends to restore this article to FA status, this work will need to be done. I should also note that the number of dead links and missing publishers in the citations a) invalidate Earwig results (which would need to check archive.org versions of dead links), and b) make it hard to locate the public domain sources, so the first step would be to clean up the citations to add archive.org verions and to add publishers. Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  00:24, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Move to FARC due to the concerns above being unaddressed. Noah Talk 14:58, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Move to FARC zero progress. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  21:08, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

FARC section

 * Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and currency. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:44, 15 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delist No progress has been made. Noah Talk 16:58, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delist. Tagged for unsourced statements. DrKay (talk) 14:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delist, considerable issues, no progress. Sandy Georgia  (Talk)  19:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delist - needs major improvements. Hog Farm Talk 21:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Nikkimaria (talk) 04:49, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.