Wikipedia:Featured article review/Vivien Leigh/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was kept by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 16:06, 7 February 2015 (UTC).

Vivien Leigh

 * Notified: WP BIO, WP Women's History, WP England, WP Theatre
 * WP:URFA nom

Deficiencies (mainly uncited text) noted on talk several weeks ago; no progress. Main contributor hasn't edited for three years. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 13:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Sandy, I am awaiting delivery of one of her biographies (through WP:McFarland), and I have a certain amount of info on Leigh from a recent Laurence Olivier re-write with (currently at PR, prior to an FAC visit). If you can hold off pulling the trigger on this one, I should be in a position to fill in any citation gaps and give the article a quick spruce up, bringing her up to 2015 standards. Is that possible? (I have no idea on how long the McFarland process will take: it's a new process, so we're feeling our way into it, so I understand if the delisting comes before the book delivery. – SchroCat (talk) 12:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * has also been working on it, and it is looking like a save. FAR is a deliberative process for that reason, and if progress is being made or expected, we can wait ... please keep the page posted on your timing, but it's looking good!  See my talk page queries on reliable sources ... Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 15:17, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Close without FARC: I am satisfied with the progress here, and although there has been a talk kerfuffle about the infobox, I believe that can be resolved through normal discussion and DR. The article is good enough now to avoid demotion. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 15:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Close without FARC: Thanks for the work done to improve the article. I've left two comments on talk regarding unclear points in the prose, but these can be dealt with there rather than here. DrKiernan (talk) 15:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC) Nikkimaria (talk) 16:06, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.