Wikipedia:Featured article review/Yes (band)/archive1




 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

Since this is not a featured article this article cannot go at WP:FAR, it should go at WP:FAC. However it is not ready for a feature article candidature for move the page. Non-admin closure by Tb hotch Talk and  C.  06:55, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Yes (band)

 * Notified: Example user, Example WikiProject

I am nominating this featured article for review because it has all the detail required for a featured article - all or almost all facts of the band are included, and the article is written in an engaging and professional way. Drumkid13 (talk) 21:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't this be FAC, not FAR?--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 22:05, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Assuming FAC was meant,

Oppose:Article needs a lot more citations, lead needs to be expanded, many more issues with this article.--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 22:08, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose – per NYMFan. Yes, it should be FAC. Novice7  |  Talk  06:13, 12 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.