Wikipedia:Featured article review/Yom Kippur War/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by Nikkimaria 03:19, 6 November 2011.

Review commentary

 * Notified: Top five editors by edit count Reenem, Hohum, Sherif9282, Jiujitsuguy, Raul654. Projects:Military history, Egypt, Israel, Jewish history, Syria, Arab world, Iraq.

A talk page notice was given in May 2010 (now in archive) and there are still outstanding issues with this article.
 * 1c There are citation needed tags, dead links and many paragraphs without citations.
 * 1d and maybe 1e. Article was the subject of an arbitration ruling for edit warring and POV issues. While this issue may have come to an end it's possible that some of the warring and POV still remain in the article.
 * 2c There is little uniformity in citations. Full information of sources are missing.
 * 3 The following files need work if they are to remain in the article:
 * File:Bridge Crossing.jpg has a commons maintenance tag.
 * File:Destroyed m60.jpg missing date and author information
 * File:Soldier Ismailiya.jpg needs an English description.
 * File:President Hafez al-Assad, Golan front, October 1973.jpg needs author information
 * File:Shot Kal-.jpg needs an English description
 * File:October war1.jpg needs an English description


 * 4 Length has been the subject of some talk page threads but at just under 150k gross size the article is certainly pushing the limits.
 * MoS MOS:Images needs to be followed Brad (talk) 12:27, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments - I made a second notification of work needed in October of 2010 (I hadn't seen Sandy's notification), but hadn't gotten back to the article to see if it still needed a FAR. After seeing this FAR opened by Brad, I agree that this article needs serious work to remain at FA status. Some thoughts: These two points are the biggest issues that need attention, in my opinion. Once these are addressed, it will be easier to see where further work is needed. Dana boomer (talk) 17:07, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The length is a huge problem. WP:SIZE recommends a top limit of 6,000-10,000 words. This article is currently at 15,500, which is way more than the top of the top limit. Heavy pruning and perhaps some removal of information to daughter articles is needed. The length of the article was at around 14,500 when I made my notification last fall, which means the article has been getting more bloated, not less.
 * As Brad points out, referencing is a major issue. The various tags, lack of referencing in some areas and poor/inconsistent formatting of references need serious attention.

FARC commentary

 * Featured article criteria mentioned in the review section include referencing, images, and length. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:25, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Delist Major issues are 1c, 2c and 4. There does not seem to be any ongoing effort to fix problems. Brad (talk) 20:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delist - Editors argue on the talk page about minor issues while the major ones go unaddressed. The length still hovers above 15,000 words, with no response as to why this article needs to be this long. Referencing has also had little done - someone went through and did some formatting, but the issues with areas lacking referencing, citation needed tags, dead link tags, missing ref info, etc., have not been addressed. Nor have the image issues brought up by Brad been addressed. As I said above, the length and referencing issues need to be addressed before a copyedit is even attempted - it's no use moving commas around when a third of the article needs to be moved to daughter articles or tossed altogether. Dana boomer (talk) 23:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.