Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/1st Academy Awards/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 23:10, 23 November 2010.

1st Academy Awards

 * Nominator(s): Tb hotch Ta lk C. 22:39, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that meets the criteria, this is the first article that I nominate for something without a previous peer review. The article is the first award ceremony on either film award, so it is a bit important. Thanks for your comments. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 22:39, 5 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 23:13, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Since these were the first awards, there should definitely be something on the background, (for example who came with the idea for starting them?). Nergaal (talk) 05:02, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Seems like MGM/AMPAS history should be added, doing... Tb hotch Ta lk C. 05:33, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I think I did it. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 02:25, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good. But going through the list I saw that there are two awards retired after this. I think it would be worthwhile to have a Reception/Aftermath section also; it should discuss asides the two retired awards, how were the awards received by the public: did they care? was it prestigious enough that people demanded it the next year? what did the organizers learn from this first edition? etc. Nergaal (talk) 20:35, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Seems like the retired awards belong into 2nd Academy Awards and about reception, I will make a research, but I don't think that I would find something. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 20:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I made a research, but I found no much information about the reception, there are books, but I cannot see them on Google books. Tb hotch Ta lk C. 19:03, 5 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I may or may not come back to the image issues. I haven't gotten a chance the last couple days, though, so it's not fair to the nominator to leave these out. (Besides, it would be better if/when I return to start fresh.) Courcelles 03:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Everything looks good, I'm not sure about image licensing, so I'll leave those to Courcelles. Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:01, 12 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Good work. Ready for promotion.--AlastorMoody (talk) 06:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support - I have no problems with the list. Afro  ( Talk ) 12:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment: Found no issues beyond what Giants found; will support when he acknowledges his concerns as addressed. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 18:18, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 05:16, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.