Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2009 WWE Draft/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 01:43, 10 May 2009.

2009 WWE Draft

 * Nominator(s):  T ru  c o  

I am nominating this for featured list because... after working on it for about a week, I feel that I have met the criteria for featured lists. This is in a way based on its predecessor FL, but not entirely. Unlike the other FL, this is set up a bit different and I hope it is more comprehensible. It was copyedit by Mattisse and Nikki (thanks alot), so hopefully only few mistakes are found. Happy reviewing. Note: I don't think stability will be an issue since the event is completely over now, and will not be affected heavily by future events.-- T ru  c o   01:55, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: I, Truco, am taking a semi-leave from Wiki at the time I'm typing this. Any further comments will be addressed by members of WP:PW. Thanks!-- T ru  c o   03:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Support from KV5  ( Talk  •  Phils ) 16:20, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Comments -
 * Would you mind linking legitimate to the appropriate page here? That comes off as an element of jargon that could use the further explanation that a link provides.
 * Done.-- T ru  c o   02:50, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Background: "A Supplemental Draft was announced to be held on April 15." The "was announced to be held" part is a little awkward.
 * Changed to 'announced for'-- T ru  c o   02:50, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Aftermath: "they carried their title over to their new brand." Should "title" be plural.
 * Done.-- T ru  c o   02:50, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * "two secondary championships switched brands for the first time in WWE's history." This could use a cite if it isn't in one of the general references.
 * Its verified by the history itself really, as WWE does not have a direct source stating so. Plus, the title has been on Raw since the original draft and its the first time it switches brands as a result, same for the women's titles.-- T ru  c o   02:50, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * "the draft would not come into an effect until the after...". Remove "an" and "the".
 * Done.-- T ru  c o   02:50, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Link Madison Square Garden.  Giants2008  ( 17-14 ) 22:17, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Reworded statement.-- T ru  c o   02:50, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Support - Note that I made a sentence structure improvement myself before coming here. I was ready to support when I saw it, and figured it would be easy enough to fix it myself.  Giants2008  ( 17-14 ) 02:22, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Sources
 * What makes http://www.gerweck.net/ratings.htm reliable? Dabomb87 (talk) 02:06, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * They got their information from Nielsen Media Research.-- T ru  c o   01:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll leave this out for other reviewers to decide. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Would it be feasible to add embedded images in the tables? After all, a large portion of the wrestlers do have free images. -- Scorpion 0422  21:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.