Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2009 Women's Cricket World Cup squads/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Hahc21 10:01, 7 October 2013 (UTC).

2009 Women's Cricket World Cup squads

 * Nominator(s):  Harrias  talk 15:00, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

A list based upon the featured list 2013 Women's Cricket World Cup squads. As always, all thoughts, comments and criticisms are welcome!  Harrias  talk 15:00, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Comment – my only concern is those redlinks, especially in the last two tables. Zia Khan 14:05, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Support on prose and images. Good job! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:25, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Zia Khan 17:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments from &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  
 * Bowling styles could be linked to Types of bowlers in cricket
 * Done.  Harrias  talk 15:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Any reasons for not including Inns. and Bowl avg. in the table?

&mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  08:36, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Essentially just to stop the table from becoming too unwieldy, it is designed to be a bit of a quick reference, rather than an in-depth analysis.  Harrias  talk 15:43, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Leave Inns, but bowl avg. is definitely a significant parameter in these lists. The "stumpings" column hasn't got any significance here as it remains a null for most of the teams except Aus, Ind and Eng. You could merge both catches and stumpings in a single column and rename it accordingly and add a note. &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  16:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Simply put, I disagree. Merging catches and stumpings would mean the table wouldn't be sortable on stumpings, and while it may be a relatively minor statistic it is a very relevant one for wicket-keepers, and if the statistic is in the table, it should be sortable by. Bowling average in one-day cricket is actually, in my opinion, an unimportant statistic, economy and wickets taken give a much better summary of a bowler's performance.  Harrias  talk 16:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I never thought that way! you're right merging them would be a bad idea. List looks very fine.


 * Support &mdash; Vensatry (Ping me)  04:53, 17 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Support. I'd like to see some more of those redlinks turn blue hopefully someday soon. Otherwise, quite well organized and sourced. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:49, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.