Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/29th Golden Raspberry Awards/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 22:48, 16 May 2009.

29th Golden Raspberry Awards

 * Nominator(s): Cirt (talk) 17:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

I've recently done a bit of work on this page, and got some great pointers at a peer review, which also helped to improve it further. I present it here for consideration for WP:FL status. I'll do my best to address comments. Thank you for your time, Cirt (talk) 17:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - the heading of the image column should say "image"— Chris!  c t 04:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Cirt (talk) 05:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Look pretty good, I'll support.— Chris!  c t 23:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Cheers and well done. I support this list's promotion per WP:WIAFL. KV5  ( Talk  •  Phils ) 15:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Bingo!, or Support! Cirt has produced a great list but, more importantly, acted positively on advice and created an excellent list.  Fab.  The Rambling Man (talk) 19:10, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

-- Crzycheetah 02:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * I think you need to mention that people need to pay for the membership in order to vote. Right now, it says that if you visit the website you can vote as if there's a poll on the website or something.
 * Can you remove "center" from all images in the table. It makes all images overlap with the "recipient" column in the IE browser.
 * Done. and Done. The fact that individuals must pay to become members is already stated - See the beginning of the sentence Paid members of the Golden Raspberry Award Foundation... Cirt (talk) 20:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Support I offered my suggestions at the peer review. This list has only improved since then. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.