Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/50 Cent discography/archive4


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 20:06, 25 December 2011.

50 Cent discography

 * Nominator(s): I Am Rufus  &bull;  Conversation is a beautiful thing.  17:39, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I've done extensive work on this article, and I finally feel it is truly up to the standard required (of course, you may think otherwise). Since the last, hasty nomination, the article has had a peer review and has had many of its previous errors pointed out and removed. Hopefully, this nomination will iron out any small errors still left and leave us with a great article. I Am Rufus  &bull;  Conversation is a beautiful thing.  17:39, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Support – I peer reviewed this article and feel that it is finally ready for the bronze star. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  19:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

—Michael Jester (talk) 23:15, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Excellent job on the article. I feel that this work can be featured. Support.


 * Support – everything looks good. Nice work! — Status  &#x7B;talk contribs 18:06, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

OK, after reading all of these comments, here's everything I have done:
 * Comments from nominator (Sufur222)
 * Changed infobox entry from "DVDs" to "Video albums" and linked it up.
 * Changed "Collaboration and soundtrack appearances" heading to "Guest appearances", as suggested.
 * Inserted en-dash in reference titles everywhere needed.
 * Italicized Billboard in all of the XML reference titles.
 * Removed the G-Unit hashtag at the top, and made a "See also" section containing a link to their discography, as suggested.
 * Inserted italics into references where appropriate.
 * Separated out compilation and soundtrack albums sections.
 * Found references all of the remaining uncharted singles. (However, have removed one of the two references for "Haters", as I feel only one is neccessary.)
 * Removed date on sales figure for 50 Cent: The New Breed.

There are some other comments I wish to make as well: —Michael Jester (talk) 22:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC) —Michael Jester (talk) 22:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC) —Michael Jester (talk) 22:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm getting conflicting advice over the formatting of the references. In his peer review, Wikipedian Penguin told me to only link every work/publisher only the first time, but Michael Jester has told me to wikilink everything - which is right? Also, WP also told me whilst referring to individual weeks of Billboard charts, to refer to Nielsen Business Media as the publisher if the chart was published during their ownership of the company. However, when I tried this on Birdman discography, JohnFromPinckney told me that they should ALL be Prometheus. Again, which is right?
 * For references, everything should be linked. J Milburn explained it well in the FLC of K-ci & JoJo discography.
 * For the Nielsen Business Media/Prometheus Global Media thingy, I personally use Prometheus Global Media for everything on the web and use Nielsen for the magazine.
 * Some of the sales figures are listed as according to the RIAA, yet some are simply US. When I read this discussion at WP:DISCOGSTYLE, I thought that the abbreviations would only be used for certifications: however, it appears that they are hovering in limbo. I presume this is a mistake from when the abbreviations were changed: however, I want to be certain.
 * Yeah, only the certifications are suppose to be abbreviated with providers. It looks like someone made a simple mistake.
 * I'm not yet sure what to write about "miscellaneous": currently thinking - any ideas welcome.
 * Personally, I prefer to keep the collaborations singles separate from the main singles table - however, if the consensus is overwhelmingly in favour of combining the two tables, I will happily do it.
 * Dosen't matter to me.

Thanks for all your work and help, guys. I Am Rufus  &bull;  Conversation is a beautiful thing.  21:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

—Michael Jester (talk) 22:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, that's what we're here for!

I apologize for taking so long to come back to this. I have looked the page over (again) and I like it very much. I support the promotion and congratulate Rufus on some really good work. &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk) 18:46, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.