Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/59th National Film Awards/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 18:21, 4 January 2013.

59th National Film Awards

 * Nominator(s): -  Vivvt  &bull;&#32; ( Talk ) 01:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because since its last FLC nomination, article has gone thru lot of changes, including copy-edit by GoCE member which was a major point in last FLC. I hope to get it done this time. -  Vivvt  &bull;&#32; ( Talk ) 01:43, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose without citations. (You k"now my detail views from my comments elsewhere and you also know that my alone's opinion doesn't count. Good luck with FLC. ) §§ dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 06:04, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * By citations, you mean "official citations for the awards", right? (to clarify that lack of verifiability is not the reason for your oppose).--Dwaipayan (talk) 07:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh of course, right! My mistake. §§ dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 08:52, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * There is absolutely nothing I can do for the citation with a possible copy-vio suspect . For other articles, those are taken from various sources so we can deal with them. Here, per copyright experts, lot of stuff is taken from a single source so its a pretty difficult situation to deal with. Besides citations, you may want to put comments on other stuff. -  Vivvt  &bull;&#32; ( Talk ) 12:47, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * No other comments. §§ dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 16:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Oppose still weak on prose, review the lead alone....


 * Note, I've reviewed the lead alone thus far and on a re-review can still find a handful of issues. I don't have the energy to review this list in depth, so I'll leave it to our other very able reviewers to iron out some of the major outstanding issues before I re-visit.  The Rambling Man (talk) 17:28, 31 December 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.