Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/59th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 22 August 2022 (UTC).

59th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards

 * Nominator(s): RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:27, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

I've been working on more recent Emmy ceremonies, but I saw the this list was in and decided to completely redo it. Fun fact: This ceremony saw the first "broadband" nominee. To quote one article, "Twenty years from now, when Emmy [sic] only recognizes programming found on the Internet, historians will point to the mostly forgotten Drive as the show that started it all." Seems pretty accurate to me. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:27, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments

 * "Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee received five wins from 11 nominations, leading all programs in both categories" - what are "both" categories? The last mention of categories said there were 66?  Do you mean across the two ceremonies?
 * If the presenters are in alpha order, Miley Cyrus should be after her dad
 * That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Done. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:13, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by Birdienest81

 * Per MOS:CONFORMTITLE, titles of TV series and movies should be italicized even in citations.
 * Per MOS:QWQ, quotations within quotations (namely quotations inside the article title) should be formated with half quotation)
 * Bob said: "My favorite episode of Cheers is 'Thanksgiving Orphans' which aired in 1986."

Otherwise this is good.
 * -- Birdienest81 talk  09:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Done. RunningTiger123 (talk) 15:08, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Support: Good work.
 * -- Birdienest81  talk  00:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Dank

 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * Checking the FLC criteria:
 * 1. No problem with the prose. I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the tables.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 20:15, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by Z1720

 * No concerns with prose in the lede


 * Image check
 * Licencing is good.
 * Instead of px, use upright per MOS:IMAGESIZE

Version reviewed, spotcheck not done
 * Source check
 * No concerns with quality or formatting.

Please ping when the image concern is addressed. Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 15:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Issues have been fixed. RunningTiger123 (talk) 00:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Support. My concerns have been addressed. Z1720 (talk) 01:43, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 22:33, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.