Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/68th Academy Awards/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Giants2008 10:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC).

68th Academy Awards

 * Nominator(s): Birdienest81 (talk) 07:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

I am nominating the 1996 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I read the requirements and criteria. I also followed how the 1929, 1990, 1992, 2000, 2004, 2009, 2010, and 2012 Oscars were written. Birdienest81 (talk) 07:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

There's a confusing "it also lower a higher" in the ratings section that needs to be rewritted, otherwise good work like with the others and Support. Reywas92 Talk 07:52, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Fixed: I changed "it also lower a higher" to "it also earned."
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 15:33, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

"The ceremony, televised in the United States by ABC." That sentence lacks a verb. Perhaps it can be "The ceremony was televised...". The special awards and very few and may be better in a single section. In multiple nominations and awards you said "The following 19 films received multiple awards" over the list of multiple nominations. "The following individuals (listed in order of appearance) presented awards or performed musical numbers" lacks a period, and the parentesis may be replaced by commas. Cambalachero (talk) 15:23, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Fixed: I fixed everything you listed above. Thank you. --Birdienest81 (talk) 18:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Support Cambalachero (talk) 18:44, 31 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment The header in the In Memoriam section is italicized, but is in quotes in the prose – which one should it be?&#32;~HueSatLum 02:00, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Fixed: It is supposed to be in italics.
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 15:52, 7 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Support. Great job on prose and meeting the FL criteria. — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 11:56, 14 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Support. Looks easy to read and is well organized.-Jairus Garin (talk) 01:40, 31 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.