Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/74th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC).

74th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards

 * Nominator(s): RunningTiger123 (talk) 21:39, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

It's been a little bit, but I'm back with my fourth in this series of FLCs (following the 73rd, 72nd, and 59th ceremonies). It's very similar to those lists, but as always, any new feedback is appreciated. RunningTiger123 (talk) 21:39, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Dank

 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * Good to see you back here.
 * In 74th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards, "This year" (used twice) doesn't sound right to me, even though "the year I just mentioned" (i.e. "That year") is one of the possible meanings of the phrase, which would be fine. Paradoxically, if we were talking about the 2010 awards, "this year" would have no ambiguity at all. But when you're writing about the 2022 awards in 2022, I think some readers will take this to mean "the current year", which would probably be a MOS:CURRENT problem.
 * In the same section: "both were shifted" sounds fine ... that's an action someone took ... but "were now ineligible" would probably be better as "became ineligible".
 * I don't think the "Personalty rights warning" applies on the RuPaul image, as a photo of "an identifiable individual taken in a public place". If anyone disagrees, I'll look into it.
 * Checking the FLC criteria:
 * 1. The prose checks out. I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the tables. I believe table captions and proper coding were all present, but I got bored at some point so I might have missed some.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Close enough. Support. Well done.
 * You might be interested in my current FLC nomination. - Dank (push to talk) 01:50, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Done (except for the image rights – I'm not an expert and I don't think it hurts to have it, so I'll leave it for now). Thanks for the feedback. RunningTiger123 (talk) 18:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments

 * The only thing I got is that I think "Any films placed on the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences platform became ineligible for the Emmys. (Previously, this rule only applied to non-documentary films.)" should be "Any films placed on the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences platform became ineligible for the Emmys (previously, this rule only applied to non-documentary films)." -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Done. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:05, 5 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Support by Chompy Ace

 * That's it! There is the only thing you need to resolve: Archive all archivable sources to prevent link rot. Also, if you have time would you care for reviewing the List of accolades received by 24 Oras regarding its featured list nomination? Chompy Ace 10:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Done (IABot wasn't working when I initially created the nomination). RunningTiger123 (talk) 18:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Support Chompy Ace 19:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Source review – All of the references are reliable and well-formatted, and the link-checker tool turns up no issues. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:10, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Closing, promoted. -- Pres N  03:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.