Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/74th Primetime Emmy Awards/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC).

74th Primetime Emmy Awards

 * Nominator(s): RunningTiger123 (talk) 19:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

With the 2022 Creative Arts ceremony at multiple supports at FLC, here's the main ceremony from that year. This ceremony could feel like more of the same, though there were some pleasant surprises. The list is modeled off the 72nd and 73rd ceremonies, both FLs. As always, any feedback is much appreciated. RunningTiger123 (talk) 19:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Dank

 * Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
 * "than any other network/platform": per MOS:SLASH, if "than any other network or platform" would work, use that (unless there's something going on here that I don't know about).
 * "but only won 26 this year": "this" becomes a MOS:CURRENT problem when you're talking about 2022 in 2023 (because it would be natural for many readers to assume you literally mean "this year"). Reword.
 * I have no idea what's going on with the license for File:210305 이정재.jpg since I don't read Korean. I don't know if it's a problem or not.
 * I'm assuming you are referring to the link, which has been fixed. If not, let me know.
 * For this, I'll ping a coord (below). - Dank (push to talk) 03:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't have any preference on where to sort "The 64th Annual Grammy Awards" ... you've got it under "G". That's not usually what I see at WP:FLC.
 * I was copying them based on how the sources order them, and they seem to sort by "Grammy" (same with the Tonys, Golden Globes, etc.).
 * Okay, now I see "DEFAULTSORT:Grammy Awards" at the bottom of the page. Works for me. - Dank (push to talk) 03:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * "The Beatles: Get Back": Sort it under "B".
 * Checking the FLC criteria:
 * 1. By the time you see this, I may have done a little copyediting ... if so, feel free to revert or discuss. I checked sorting on all sortable columns and sampled the links in the table.
 * 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
 * 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
 * 3b. The list is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any actual problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
 * 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
 * 4. It is navigable.
 * 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine (except as mentioned above).
 * 6. It is stable.
 * Close enough for a support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 22:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I left a few comments to clarify; thanks as always for your review! RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:06, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I can't tell if File:210305 이정재.jpg would normally pass an image review, in part since I don't read Korean but also because of the image source (YouTube). I don't know if it's a problem or not, and I'm not even sure who to ask about this. - Dank (push to talk) 03:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * YouTube screenshots are allowed as long as the video where it was taken from was released under Creative Commons. In this case, the video source has a CC license. According to YouTube's help page, videos will be marked under a CC BY 3.0 license, which is allowed per Commons:Licensing. Harushiga (talk) 04:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not really sure what an FLC-level image review is supposed to be ... I just know that, in harder cases, whatever it is, it's above my pay grade, and I need to yell for help, as I did here. I'm sure RunningTiger knows image rules better than I do. - Dank (push to talk) 15:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Oops! Forgot to ask for help with my noms ... List of early-diverging flowering plant families could use a review. - Dank (push to talk) 03:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Other reviews

 * Support - all good -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment by Birdienest81
 * This looks like a very comprehensive list that was well cited with reliable sources. I think the only thing I could point is that for Los Angeles Times which require subscription should have  utilized. Although, interestingly enough, when I view LA Times articles using Chrome or Microsoft Edge, I'm able to access one article per day. However, when I use Chrome's Private/Incognito mode, I don't have access to said articles unless I'm a subscriber. So, that one you may have to ask The Rambling Man for that. Also, somebody changed the URL access of the New York Times articles used in the 94th Academy Awards from   to  . According to Rambling Man from a previous FLC, it should be "limited". So I don't know if you have to  change the NY Times ones from "subscription" to "limited" since NY Times allows like 3-5 articles for free daily.
 * That being said, I'm giving this ceremony article a Support. Great job.
 * -- Birdienest81 talk  05:19, 16 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Support--金色黎明 (talk) 03:16, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Support. Also, if you have time would you care for reviewing the List of accolades received by Top Gun: Maverick regarding its featured list nomination? Chompy Ace 21:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Closing, promoted. -- Pres N  03:09, 25 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.