Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/76th Academy Awards/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Giants2008 10:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC).

76th Academy Awards

 * Nominator(s): Birdienest81 (talk) 21:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

I am nominating the 2004 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I read the requirements and criteria. I also followed how the 1929, 2000, 2009, 2010, and 2012 Oscars were written. Birdienest81 (talk) 21:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Support – Underneath-it-All (talk) 21:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC)


 * I think that the winning film in each category should be in bold, because it's not really clear who the winner is in each category. It would define who the winner was. Obviously a little note would have to go at the top of the table saying winner is highlighted in bold. But apart from that, I can't really fault it. So I'll Support with the assurance that winners will be put in bold. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   21:44, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I disagree, Winners don't need bold, but ideally need a symbol like double dagger for WP:ACCESS. Therefore, it should remain as it is. Plus, Support! Good job on meeting every single criteria! — SoapFan12 Talk Face-smile.svg   01:05, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I think bold makes it clear, like on 2013 Grammy Awards. A symbol would be good too. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   09:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 2013 Grammy Awards isn't a FL which isn't a reliable source. However, I do understand where you are coming from. — SoapFan12 Talk Face-smile.svg   11:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
 * It doesn't need to be an FL. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   12:35, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Each article about awards ceremonies is different. The Grammys have been structured like this for years (and since a few years ago, it started to include winners and nominees when in the past only winners were listed (e.g. 1965 Grammy Awards). The AA and the GA are different, especially if we consider the GA have many categories and the AA a few (in comparison). Being a FL or not may be relevant to follow or compare its structure, but they shouldn't look similar if there is no reason to be similar. Excepting for Academy Award for Best Actor (and I don't know why), none of the AA articles is bolded, why this is an exception? Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!  See terms and conditions.  17:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Fixed: I have fixed everything plus some other grammar/spelling errors (BTW, sporting does mean wearing, but I changed it to avoid further confusion).
 * -Birdienest81 (talk) 17:25, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, I found no other issues. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!  See terms and conditions.  03:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.