Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Alabama Crimson Tide football seasons


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Matthewedwards 20:11, 11 October 2008.

Alabama Crimson Tide football seasons
I am nominating this article because I think it fulfills the FL criteria, in addressing said subject. It is modeled after Virginia Tech Hokies football seasons, a featured list. Patriarca12 (talk) 00:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Support - My comments have been resolved to meet the FL Criteria.-- S R X  20:49, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Further Comments
 * What makes http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/index.php a reliable source?
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] It is a 3rd party source that serves as a single source for final poll rankings, and has been utilized in other articles as a source. However, I did dig around and took the same information form an NCAA source. Patriarca12 (talk) 15:39, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * A number of your website references lack last acess dates.
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Corrected. Patriarca12 (talk) 15:39, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Otherwise sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comments from
 * En dashes for page ranges like "111-112. " per WP:DASH
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Added


 * "References:[9]" – "References: [9]"
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Corrected


 * "9-3-1" – "9–3–1" – en dashes too
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Added


 * "every other SEC team." – "every other SEC team." – I doubt people will think that they beat themselves
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Corrected


 * "1924-1926" – en dash
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Added


 * Otherwise, the prose is pretty good. I'm not so sure about the table, however, but I'll leave that for others to decide.

Gary King ( talk ) 06:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Comments addressed, thank you for taking the time to look through the article! Patriarca12 (talk) 14:43, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Support — Excellent work. Well-cited, aesthetically pleasing, and well constructed. Follows the conventions of your previous work and the prototypical example given above. My only hesitation comes from the large number of single-season redlinks, but I've never been afraid of those. Good work! JKBrooks85 (talk) 10:49, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Support Excellent article.--User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 21:10, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Comment Any source for the number of ten-win seasons? --User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 16:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Yes check.svg|20px]] Removed statement altogether as I could not find a single source stating the fact, only comparison with varying sources that may bee seen as WP:OR. Patriarca12 (talk) 17:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Support, looks good to me. --Golbez (talk) 20:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.