Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Angels in Neon Genesis Evangelion/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC).

Angels in Neon Genesis Evangelion

 * Nominator(s): TeenAngels1234 (talk) 13:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because, after several months and years of work, I believe it has reached a level of quality where it can be nominated here. TeenAngels1234 (talk) 13:30, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - 475 citations. That's a tall order. GamerPro64  02:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Very good work on this article. But I think it's more accurately described as an article, rather than a list. This is just a suggestion, but I think it'd be better to nominate this as a featured article instead; or a good article. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 15:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I think he tried once but got reverted due to this.Tintor2 (talk) 18:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Oppose not a list, this is clearly an article. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 18:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I am rather confused now. On the 4th of July my nomination for GA was cancelled because it was considered list, and now I am told that I should do a GAN or FAN instead. The article in TP is still marked as a list, anyway. I honestly wouldn't know what to say.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 08:58, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, this is what the page looked like before you started working on it, so I can understand why it'd be classified as a list back then. But given the extensive amount of work you've put into this page since then and the plethora of information available, this page is not just a mere list. Especially given the existence and extensive size of the "Conception", "Characteristics", "In other media", "Cultural references and interpretations", and "Cultural impact" sections. Whoever looked at the page at its current state and told you it was a list that couldn't be nominated as a good article didn't know what they were talking about. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 09:33, 9 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Oppose. Apologies for piling on, but I agree with the above conversation that this is an article and not a list so this is not the appropriate venue for this nomination. Sorry. Aoba47 (talk) 16:56, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Don't worry. You have nothing to apologise for, Aoba. By now it is obvious that the article is not to be considered a list and that the user who sent me back here by cancelling the GAN was in all good faith wrong. I'd suggest to archive this, since it's now apodictic.-TeenAngels1234 (talk) 17:34, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I respect and appreciate your response. It is never a great feeling to get these kinds of comments, but you have taken a very positive and constructive perspective on that. I wish that I was able to keep my cool that well during situations like this one lol. You have done a lot of great work on this article and that should be commended. Best of luck with the future GAN if you decide to pursue that path. Aoba47 (talk) 18:29, 11 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Oppose Agree with above. Unfortunately this is now an article. Fantastic work though on improving this as a fellow Neon Genesis Evangelion fan and do not be disheartened. I wish you well. Cowlibob (talk) 19:42, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Closing, good luck at GAN! -- Pres N  13:57, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.