Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Audie Murphy honors and awards/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:SchroCat 10:40, 13 March 2014.

Audie Murphy honors and awards

 * Nominator(s): — Maile (talk) 01:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because the subject matter is of historical significance to both military history and the film industry. It is also one of three articles I would like to take to Featured Topic. The main article of Audie Murphy is being worked on to prepare for submission for FA, and Audie Murphy filmography is currently at FLC has been with drawn from FLC consideration but will be resubmitted at a later date. — Maile (talk) 01:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - the FLC instructions state that Users should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. As the filmography list has not gained the required level of support as yet, this list should not also have been nominated....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I have put a request on the FLC for the filmography to be withdrawn. — Maile (talk) 16:13, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delegate comment - The second review has now been withdrawn and removed from FLC. - SchroCat (talk) 22:13, 10 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Support A great list about a distinguished soldier. Took me a moment to work out which of the 3rd Infantry Division's ten campaigns and four amphibious assaults he missed out on. (For the record, his nine campaign stars were for: Tunisia, Sicily (with arrowhead), Naples-Foggia, Anzio, Rome-Arno, Southern France (with arrowhead), Ardennes-Alsace, Rhineland, Central Europe) Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment – About the Service ranks section: I think it would be better to name the "Notes" column as "Date of promotion".  This seems to make the meaning of the date clearer. Jimknut (talk) 01:23, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I completely agree, and have renamed the column. — Maile (talk) 01:31, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Support (having stumbled here from my FLC discussion page). Extremely well done and quite thorough. I echo the comments by, above. This is a most encyclopedic page about an educational topic. I think it is more standard to name the References sect "Notes" and the Bibliography sect "References". Good luck with the rest of the Featured Topic quality improvement process, I'd like to hear how that all turns out. Great job overall by , &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments -
 * Per WP:DATE All article body text should be in a consistent date format, "..by President Harry Truman on 25 September 1950." "...by Gov Rick Perry Aug 19, 2013".
 * Fixed. — Maile (talk) 12:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)


 * "September, 2008 No comma between month and year.
 * Fixed. — Maile (talk) 12:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Notes should also have consistent formats "..Congress, 2 July 1926.."
 * Fixed. — Maile (talk) 12:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)


 * "[60][61]In 2012" Space between citation and text.
 * Fixed. — Maile (talk) 12:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)


 * No Retrieval date for Ref 29.
 * Fixed. — Maile (talk) 12:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)


 * "Texas Legislative Medal of Honor" Notes should have a full stop.
 * Fixed. — Maile (talk) 12:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Aureez ( Talk ) 11:36, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I have fixed them all now. You have a very good eye.  Thanks for catching these. — Maile  (talk) 12:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Support - I see no issues with the list, maybe get in touch with the other reviewers and see if they have any further comments. Aureez  ( Talk ) 12:17, 11 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: I was asked to revisit my comments here. I took another look through the page and it is high-quality and well-referenced throughout. I reiterate my Support. Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 18:16, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

– SchroCat (talk) 10:49, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.