Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Billboard Latin Music Award for Hot Latin Song of the Year/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2018 (UTC).

Billboard Latin Music Award for Hot Latin Song of the Year

 * Nominator(s): Brankestein (talk) 03:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I think that the Billboard Latin Music Award for Hot Latin Songs is an important recognition for Spanish-language hits in the United States. Brankestein (talk) 03:57, 15 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Support now that my comments have been resolved. – jona  ✉ 17:23, 18 April 2018 (UTC)



That's all I found. Freikorp (talk) 11:11, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Support I'd still like to see all the years' ceremonies redlinked, but that's not enough to withhold support for. Courcelles (talk) 16:55, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm seeing a couple violations of MOS:ALLCAPS in the references.
 * Some references give the publisher by their name (I.e Billboard and Telemundo), while others give the base url (i.e axs.com and billboardevents.com). Try and keep it consistent.

The comments from Freikorp have been up for a while, and it's unclear if you addressed all of Courcelles comments beyond the final question. Are you still working on this list? -- Pres N  19:23, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I did not see those comments on my notifications. I have edited the article following the user's suggestions. Brankestein (talk) 21:28, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Happy to support this now. Don't feel obligated but I'm looking for comments on my FLC. Freikorp (talk) 23:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The article was edited following your comments. Thanks for your suggestions! Brankestein (talk) 00:25, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Source review – The references for this article all appear to be reliable, and spot-checks of refs 5, 12, and 13 show no verifiability concerns. I did find a few items worth commenting on, though:
 * Reference 28 (AXS) is showing up in orange on the link-checker tool, which means it may be dead. Please check it to see if it's still working. If not, try looking on the Internet Archive for an archived version or find a replacement for it if no archive exists of the page. The rest of the links check out fine.
 * The page number for ref 5 is LM-8, not LM-52 as the cite says. I think this was meant to give the total number of pages to that point, but this is an incorrect citation method. We should be using the page number of the given section, not some total that doesn't actually help the reader find the page in the most direct way.
 * Minor, but the hyphen in ref 29's title should be turned into an en dash for style purposes. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 20:17, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comments. I edited the page number for ref 5 and added an en dash in ref 29. The link for ref 28 is still working. Brankestein (talk) 22:46, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Your changes look good. With everything resolved, I consider this source review a pass. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:13, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 21:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.