Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Bookseller/Diagram Prize for Oddest Title of the Year/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 22:30, 2 December 2008.

Bookseller/Diagram Prize for Oddest Title of the Year
I believe that this list meets all the critera. It has a good introduction, with a suitable image and appears to have good prose. ISD (talk) 16:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC) Support: Looks good! The list is well written, referenced and very interesting. -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 19:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Weak support - my review was resolved, but there were many prose issues, but it now meets WP:WIAFL.-- TRU CO 02:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * comment. I think author / publisher column should be seperated, and those that have nameable authors not currently mentioned (if any) are filled in, and likewise the name of the first publisher for those that only have an author. If publisher is interesting info, it should be for all books, not only those that are easiest to find because the award stated them.Yobmod (talk) 10:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Response to comment - That may be difficult. Some books have only been given the name of the publisher, or the editior or the author. By having the one column, I think it makes the table look better, and it also gives some guide behind the people or the company behind the work. ISD (talk) 12:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Difficult, but actionable. I just spent a week tracking down publishers for such a list. The prize website gave the title and author, but not publisher. The info is findable and citable, so should be included. Our list should be better than the official list if possible - if it only replicated the info directly found from the prize gives, it seems useless. Knowing the publisher is obviously useful, or it wouldn't be given for any of them. Hence i  oppose based on this.Yobmod (talk) 21:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Response to opposition - Can you give me these links please, then I can use them in the table. ISD (talk) 08:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.