Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/British Film Institute Fellowship/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 22:06, 4 November 2011.

British Film Institute Fellowship

 * Nominator(s): The Rambling Man (talk) 21:55, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Initially a quick DYK because I loved the lady in the red dress, I made this list into a proper job, with refs, alt text, scopes, no dabs, etc etc etc and had a bloody good time while doing it. I defer to the community now to decide if it's of any use as a featured list. Rest assured, real-life aside, I'll do whatever I can to ensure the nomination succeeds, and thank each and every one of you good and handsome people for spending your valuable time reading this nomination, and more so if you can spend some time reviewing the list. Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 21:55, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

These are pretty small things and can be resolved. Its a ready FL I believe. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 07:55, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment
 * You have the first reference of BBC News as unlinked, however all the The Guardian references are linked. Any reason? To maintain consistency, you should have the first instance of every new work and publisher linked, else don't link any one at all.
 * I'm linking them all because there's no guarantee which reference will hit to start with. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:43, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe per WP:ACCESS there should be a scope="row" for the primary sortable column.
 * Done, I selected the fellows themselves as the primary sorting col. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, since it is just four columns, I do think you can hard-code a width value to extend the table. For narrow-screen monitors its fine, but for wide-screens, the table appearts squeezed to the extreme left, and the photos to the extreme right. Since we cannot move the photos around, we can extend the table a bit more, I believe.
 * Have made the cols slightly wider but I just don't want them to be too wide for our minimum supported resolution, hope that's okay for you? The Rambling Man (talk) 10:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, can you find some secondary reference for the inductions other than those from BFI? Its not a mandated thing, but I generally believe in supporting primary along with secondary too.
 * Where I can I have, I've only used the BFI where I had too... I will have another look though since it was a few months back that I collated the list originally. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:43, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I believe I've responded to each of your comments, and I'm grateful for you taking the time out to review the list.  Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Support the list as FL. TRM, just tru to see if you can archive the BFI links. Chances are they would become dead. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 15:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Support - meets all criteria, a great example of a FL. Zangar (talk) 16:21, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

—Michael Jester (talk) 17:09, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Support – Can't see anything wrong with it. Great job.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.