Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Drama Series Directing Team/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Hahc21 10:01, 23 October 2013 (UTC).

Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Drama Series Directing Team

 * Nominator(s): — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 19:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets the every single criteria. Also, I believe it to be well sourced and clear. After much tweaking and further adjustments I feel that it is worthy of being a Featured List. I believe this list is worthy, considering I worked on it with the Featured lists, Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actress in a Drama Series, Outstanding Younger Actor in a Drama Series, Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series,   Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series, Outstanding Lead Actor in a Drama Series, Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series, Outstanding Drama Series  in mind. If you oppose, please address your issues here so they can be resolved. — SoapFan12 (talk,  contribs ) 19:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments –
 * The 1974–1978 portion of the table is sorting by first name, not last name. The sort templates that you used to fix a list you asked me for a review on in the past would be helpful here too.
 * ✅. — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 22:52, 22 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Since these people are nominees for a major award, are they notable enough to have articles? If so, red links would be in order.
 * These people are nominees for a minor award, they are not notable enough to have articles. The reason why is that it was a sturggle to find reliable sources and I was lucky enough to do so. This is not a popular awards so there is not reason why they should be red links would be in order.  — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 22:52, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 21:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments – I am curious just why is there a description regarding the Emmy Award itself at the beginning. In your other articles, there is no mention of it in your other lists. Other than that it looks good.
 * ---Birdienest81 (talk) 17:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The reason that there is no mention of it in my other lists is that I found the description regarding the Emmy Award like two weeks ago and those lists were already promoted so I did not see the need to add it. — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 18:36, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Support: Although, I really think that it belongs more appropriately in the article Daytime Emmy Award.
 * --Birdienest81 (talk) 01:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Support Don't see any big issues, and meets the criteria. Although in the first sentence of the second paragraph, should the 'on' become an 'of'?Caringtype1 (talk) 14:24, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Support, quite complete, and most meticulously referenced, throughout. Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:46, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Quick comments
 * "Since then, the award honored..." -> "Since then, the award has honored"
 * ✅. — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 19:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Suggest you suitably link "image orthicon camera tube".
 * ✅. — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 19:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * "The Emmy statuette is fifteen inches tall from base to tip. The statuette weighs 5 pounds..." -> "The Emmy statuette is fifteen inches tall from base to tip, weighs five pounds and.."
 * ✅. — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 19:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Not the right Norman Hall.
 * ✅. — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 19:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Why the odd headings used between tables?
 * Just to let the reader know why there is two different tables, since some readers don't read the lead. — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 19:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * No, I meant why not use normal headings? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 20:33, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Directors should be Director(s) as most often there's only one.
 * ✅. — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 19:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * 1976 wasn't awarded to a single director, this should be noted.
 * I am not sure about that since the references says that that year it was awarded to a single director however it did not add their names. What should I do? — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 19:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Add a footnote? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure, okay. However, would you please tell me exactly what the footnote should say? — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 20:33, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, it should say that for that particular year, the award wasn't given to a single director.... The Rambling Man (talk) 17:02, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * You do not understand. do you? I meant that I am not sure that the award wasn't given to a single director, the sources says it was given to a single director but did not add the name of that director. You suggest to write a footnote, after what I just explain what do you think it should say? — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 18:33, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * "You do not understand. do you?" maybe I don't then. I'll leave this review, and doubt I'll go anywhere near your nominations in future.  Good luck.  The Rambling Man (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Did I say something wrong? I was just asking if you did not understand, then I explain to cleared out the confusion. I was just asking if you understood because you replied with a message I did not understand so I figure you did not understand mine. I apologize if I sounded rude, mean or disrespectful. Again, sorry. :( — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 18:59, 16 October 2013 (UTC)


 * "Total awards won" 42 in total. 40 award ceremonies with 1 tie, 41 wins.  Why the discrepancy?
 * I do not understand. What does discrepancy mean? I am not sure what I am suppose to correct. — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 19:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't know. Add up the total awards in that table and you get 42.  There have been 40 ceremonies with one tie, so there should be 41.  You need to find the mistake.The Rambling Man (talk) 19:32, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. — SoapFan12 (talk,   contribs ) 20:33, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

The Rambling Man (talk) 11:14, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.