Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 10:01, 2 August 2013 (UTC).

Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series

 * Nominator(s):Caringtype1 and SoapFan12 23:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

This article meets every one of the Featured List criteria. There are plenty of reliable sources, and the information is presented in a clear and understandable way. Many issues and problems have been addressed in the months of improvements made to the article since then. We feel this article more than qualifies for Featured List status. If you oppose, please address your issues here so they can be resolved. SoapFan12 23:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Support: Looks great! Well referenced and written. – Underneath-it-All (talk) 16:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! SoapFan12 Talk Face-smile.svg  00:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Support: This list is well structured, written, and easy to understand. Barring slight differences, it is consistent with your previous revisions to other Daytime Emmy acting awards lists. Great work!
 * -Birdienest81 (talk) 04:44, 17 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you! SoapFan12 Talk Face-smile.svg  00:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Support: Looks as it is sourced well and well written. Good work.  Creativity  97  16:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! SoapFan12 Talk Face-smile.svg  00:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I'm holding on the support until another reviewer takes a look at prose. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Support My comments have been resolved. Lemonade51 (talk) 16:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC) Support — I can see no issues whatsoever. This is a very good list. Congratulations to all involved. --  Cassianto Talk   23:23, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! SoapFan12 Talk Face-smile.svg  16:33, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! SoapFan12 Talk Face-smile.svg  00:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments by JDC808
 * Support as per comments below. -- JDC808  ♫  20:33, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good. I have one comment about the lead. There's a slight bit of repetition in the very first sentence (Daytime Emmy Award is used twice when it could be used once).
 * "The Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series is a Daytime Emmy Award presented annually by..." This can be fixed by doing this "The Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series is an award presented annually by..."
 * ✅. SoapFan12 Talk Face-smile.svg  20:19, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Alright, looks good and I don't have an issue with the overlinking that was brought up, particularly because it's a table, not prose. -- JDC808  ♫  20:33, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks! SoapFan12 Talk Face-smile.svg  20:43, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: I am a bit worried over the fact that all the supports this has received come from the nominator canvassing asking other users to comment. See, , , . I was also asked to comment here and was also and was later even asked to promote this.  —  Statυs  ( talk ,  contribs ) 20:53, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I think it's fine since the purpose of those comments were to get more reviews comments, not necessarily support. I don't believe my co-nominator, SoapFan12 was trying to do anything shady or insinuate something like, "I'll support yours, if you support mine." It was all in the interest of getting more feedback to improve the article.Caringtype1 (talk) 21:18, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Caringtype1. It's not canvassing if you keep the request perfectly neutral. I believe I kept it neutral. Furthermore, why? I would of love if you send me on my e-mail. Are you deliberately trying to embarass me? I could lose a lot of user friends because of this. I really do not appreciate this, please respect me. Also, I asked them if they are willing and if they said ″no″. I would respect that decision. I don't see asking people for reviews, a problem. I was not asking for a support. But thank you for warning me, I will stop asking. I never thought I was doing something wrong. SoapFan12 Talk Face-smile.svg  21:20, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Not exactly wrong, however, I feel as if the amount is a bit over-the-top (also considering the fact that many people you asked to comment just supported and didn't leave any comments). I personally don't believe in requesting comments from other users unless the FLC is dead and is in a desperate need for them; this FLC has been open for not even two weeks. I'm not trying to embarrass you.  — Statυs  ( talk,  contribs ) 21:28, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * It's okay. Thanks again for warning me and sharing you're opinion! You know what, I happen to agree with you ( only request comments from other users unless the FLC is dead and is in a desperate need for them). It's sometimes, you feel that you want you're list to pass for featured status ASAP. Like Caringtype1 said, I was not trying to do anything shady or insinuate something like, "I'll support yours, if you support mine". Thanks again! SoapFan12 Talk Face-smile.svg  21:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think 6 days is "dead". 20 days, maybe. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:30, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Crisco, but I believe I know what Status meant by "dead". — SoapFan12 Talk Face-smile.svg   23:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.