Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Deepika Padukone filmography/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 01:10, 29 June 2015.

Deepika Padukone filmography

 * Nominator(s): Krimuk | 90  ( talk ) 08:22, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

After successfully taking Padukone's biography to featured status, I am nominating a fully-sourced and well-written listing of her film and music video appearances. As usual, look forward to lots of constructive comments. Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 08:22, 3 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Support My final comment: Since Piku received such a positive response from critics, it deserves a mention that it was lauded by critics. You can use this source. -- FrankBoy   CHITCHAT 12:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I would like to add it, if a certain editor wouldn't start yelling, "ohh you "hypocrat"... only deepika padukone is praised. priyanaka is bestestest!!!" -- Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 12:53, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Well in that case I have to say that your edits are quite dependable on the user you're talking about. -- FrankBoy   CHITCHAT 22:23, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Added. -- Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 01:31, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment: It is not comprehensive because Padukone's other music video appearance is not listed here. Plus, My Choice is not a film but, an online video.— Prashant 13:50, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Can, , or any administrator deal with this bad-faith oppose? This editor did the very same thing on Padukone's biography FLC here. He was then warned to not do this again, but here we go! -- Krimuk | 90  ( talk ) 13:55, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I think Prashant should be banned from commenting on Krimuk's noms, you've probably seen their dispute on my talk page in recent weeks. When it becomes personal and one childishly opposes a nom then it's disruptive to the process.♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:56, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Not just from my noms; he needs to understand that he can't do this to any editor just because he doesn't like a particular actress. He can't time and again be let off with a minor warning. This is a recurring distraction. -- Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 13:59, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh god! This list is truly incomplete and its not bad-faith. She had appeared in another musc video Phir Mile Sur Mera Tumhara. That's why I opposed. I was going to remove that oppose once it was done.— Prashant 14:01, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * FYI, Priyanka Chopra was in it as well. I don't see it mentioned in "your" list. If that isn't bad-faith, what is? -- Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 14:05, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Because I just saw the video as someone posted on Twitter. I did not meant to take you down. I'm sorry. I thought you will solve this in a cool manner.— Prashant 14:07, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Aww. How convenient. -- Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 14:22, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I was just trying to see how would you react to this. I was going to change that oppose to comment anyway. But, you took it in another way. I am not that bad Krimuk. I know how much you work hard on wikipedia.— Prashant 14:35, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Added the video. Also, the My Choice video is mentioned as a short film in the source provided, so that's that. -- Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 14:47, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong support: That was my only concern that's it. This list is well-written and now comprehensive too.— Prashant 15:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * You've both opposed and given a strong support on the same day. That's even worse. "I was just trying to see how would you react to this." . So you're using the FL process to get at editors. There you go, if that's not justification for a full ban from all featured articles/list candidates I don't know what is. You've been told many times to not act like this at FAC/FLC. You're not mature enough to control yourself here. might wish to comment here.♦  Dr. Blofeld  15:57, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * If a list is not comprehensive then, I have full right to oppose. It is much what Vensatry did at Dixit flc. He opposed it simply because the tv appearances were missing. The same case was her as this article was not comprehensive. The above summary says "I am nominating a fully-sourced and well-written listing of her film and music video appearances." So, its obvious it was not a true claim. After tyhis my concerns were resolved (thanks to me as I named the video too because of your outburst). I have/had no problem with any list as long as it is what the editor says.— Prashant 16:02, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You have a right to oppose and strike it out and later support, but "Yes, I was just trying to see how would you react to this" is a blatant admission of abuse of the process.♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:14, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Please, check before accusing me of something which I dont intend to. That was a reply to Krimuk's comment. I said about the information about that video. My above comment "Because I just saw the video as someone posted on Twitter. I did not meant to take you down. I'm sorry. I thought you will solve this in a cool manner." and his reply "Aww. How convenient".— Prashant 16:24, 7 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment – Prashant, you are being an idiot here. My mild oppose at the Madhuri nomination was mainly because of the prose quality (in lede). Nowhere have I commented about the lack of comprehensiveness. In fact, I was trying to indirectly help the nominator as someone was opposing the candidate solely based on the absence of a TV show and a relatively-unknown regional film (citing the 3a criterion). I must say that your comments really don't make any sense and are hardly helpful in any of the nominations here. Initially, you came up with a nonsensical oppose and after a bit of quarrel with Krimuk and Blofeld you switched to a strong support. Making statements like "Yes, I was just trying to see how would you react to this" clearly shows you are using this process to have a go against editors, as Blofeld says. Further, "I am not that bad Krimuk" is nothing but a self-admittance of how much a bad-faith editor you are. It's high time you realize that you need to grow up because this is the nth time that your conduct has been questioned. I won't be too surprised if you get a topic ban in the near future. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 18:12, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Oppose; the table seems relatively short, compared to other filmography lists; why can't this be merged to Deepika Padukone? Seattle (talk) 21:00, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure about the minimal count for these type of lists, but 25+ seems pretty much acceptable. &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 21:04, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the size of the parent article is quite large. This does warrant a separate page for her filmography, which will only increase with time. -- Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 04:47, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * With my delegate's hat on: I don't see a 3b violation here, both because the main article on the actress is already really big, and because there is no fixed minimum for lists. A 25-film filmography is no less valid than a 50+ film filmography, at least according to the criteria. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 06:10, 16 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Support Looks good to me!♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you Doctor. :) -- Krimuk | 90 ( talk ) 15:03, 21 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Support Looks good &mdash; Vensatry (ping) 09:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Giants2008 ( Talk ) 01:31, 29 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.