Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Degrassi: The Next Generation (season 4)


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted 07:37, 8 March 2008.

Degrassi: The Next Generation (season 4)
Continuing my drive to get the season articles of Degrassi: The Next Generation to FL status, here is season 4, and season 3 (see nomination entry below). I think this article is on par with other season articles that have been promoted, and meets all criterea, even if I can't spell it! All comments will addressed. Thanks. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 07:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Comments How come this is at FLC is if Smallville (Season 1), which is very similar to this, is at FAC? indopug (talk) 06:08, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure exactly what you mean, but I think you mean why is this listed at FLC, and Smallville (season 1) at FAC. Well I listed this (and the other Degrassi season articles) here because 14 other season articles of Featured Status are catalogued at Featured_lists, and just as reviewers are saying at Featured list candidates/The Office (U.S. season 3), it doesn't matter how much prose is in the article, the article is still a list. Hope that that is the correct answer to your question. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 06:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The Smallville nominator says that the Smallville (season 1) is an article because it contains more prose due to the presence of a production section. Then I must ask, why do the Degrassi lists not have a production section? Wouldn't that imply non-comprehensiveness? indopug (talk) 11:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think so because as he says, Smallville season 1 is prose with a list, rather than these which are lists with some prose. Series-wide production info is at D:TNG. D:TNG (season 4) is most definitley a list. It lists the episodes, it lists the contents of the DVD release, it lists the cast and it lists the crew. The style for these Degrassi season pages is very similar to the Lost season pages, and slightly similar to the Simpsons season pages which contain even less information in prose — but that's allowed. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 01:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * OK cool then; just wanted to make things clear, although I still think its weird that different shows can follow completely different formats. indopug (talk) 04:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's different shows per se. It's more to do with the content of the articles and the way they're written. Production information and lots of other stuff could be added to these lists, but then it becomes less of a list and more of an article. The prose in this article is all stuff that can easily be turned into lists, all except "Reception" that is, and even the awards paragraph in that section could be listified. Also, the requirements for FL status seems to be less strict than those for FA status, but that isn't the reason it's listed here. It's because it's a list. -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 23:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Support - again, good work! The Rambling Man (talk) 10:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I think that there are too many fair-use images of DVD covers. I want to make sure that it is allowed to have multiple fair-use images in a page before I support. Is there any fair-use specialist that can help us resolve this? -- Crzycheetah 00:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm.. I haven't found a policy at Help:Contents/Images and media, and I notice that Through the Looking Glass (Lost) has three fair use images, although I am aware of the policy regarding "this one has it, so can this one" (even thogh I can't find it!). -- Matthew | talk | Contribs 18:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I just remember long time ago many fair-use images were removed from similar pages stating that no more than one fair-use image should be used. I can't find anything now either; therefore, I support. -- Crzycheetah 21:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Support I can support this. Good job. -- Scorpion0422 02:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.