Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Disturbed discography


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 17:24, 31 March 2009.

Disturbed discography

 * Nominator(s):   C  anniba loki  

I am nominating this for featured list because... my concerns with the text (regarding the grammar) were corrected at the peer review. Then, I feel that this discography is more prepared to receive your comments. Thanks in advance. C anniba loki  04:27, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Review by 
 * General
 * Fix the dab (based on the checker tool at the right in the toolbox)
 * Lead
 * In June 2002, Disturbed released the documentary M.O.L., which showed some of the band's more personal moments in the studio and during tours, as well as featuring several music videos and live performances. -- is the the needed before documentary? I don't see it proper there
 * Disturbed then, released their second studio album, Believe, in September 2002. -- Remove the comma after then
 * Believe was certified double platinum by the RIAA, and platinum by ARIA and CRIA. -- CRIA acronym is not spelled out before this mention
 * The album's first single, "Prayer" peaked at #14 on the Canadian Singles Chart, and #31 on the UK Singles Chart. -- Comma after "Prayer"
 * It was released in February 2004, and reached only the #148 position on the US Billboard 200. -- -->and only reached #148 on the US Billboard 2000. [too wordy]
 * Three years after the release of Believe, Disturbed released their third studio album, titled Ten Thousand Fists, in September 2005. -- no need for titled
 * The album reached the same positions that its predecessor had; topping the US Billboard 200 and New Zealand RIANZ charts, and peaked at #2 in the Canadian Albums Charts. -- (1)Remain consistent with the tenses, peaked --> peaking (2)in -->on
 * Later, "Stricken" was certified gold by the RIAA. --> "Stricken" was later certified gold by the RIAA.
 * Like its predecessor, it peaked at #1 on US, and New Zealand; in addition, it also reached the top position of the Canadian and Australian charts. --> Like its predecessor, it peaked at #1 on the US and New Zealand charts; in addition, it also reached the top position of the Canadian and Australian charts.
 * Tables and references check out fine from my view.--Best,  ₮ RU  C Ө   00:11, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Doing... C anniba  loki  01:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * All done. C anniba  loki  02:21, 15 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Support -- Previous issues resolved to meet WP:WIAFL standards. Great work.--Best,  ₮ RU  C Ө   15:28, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Comment Everything looks good, my only concern is the last sentence. Is it really needed to mention other bands who have reached #1 three times or more? If so, then what about Beatles, MJ, Led Zeppelin, etc. That's unnecessary (genre doesn't count here).  Rockk3r      Spit it Out!  02:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course! I can only use what is written in the text of the news in which we are using as reference. Hmm?  C  anniba loki  04:40, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Very nice work. One minor concern, does MTV and MTV Networks really need to be linked a dozen times in the references section? You should link it the first time, then not again. -- Scorpion 0422  16:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Done.  C  anniba loki  17:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Comment
 * "The band has released three consecutive number-one albums that have charted on the Billboard 200, a feat that also has been accomplished by Van Halen, U2, Metallica, Dave Matthews Band, Staind and System of a Down."—I don't understand this sentence, haven't artist such as The Beatles, Madonna and Michael Jackson (among any number of very popular artistes) done the same? Why have only these specific bands mentioned in the article? indopug (talk) 16:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I can not create unpublished syntheses of sourced material, right?
 * In the lead #1 should be "number one" and #21 should be "number 21". Per WP:MOSNUM "in the body of an article, single-digit whole numbers from zero to nine are spelled out in words; numbers greater than nine are commonly rendered in numerals, or may be rendered in words if they are expressed in one or two words".
 * Interesting... Done.
 * "which also featured the bands Taproot, Chevelle, and Ünloco" how is this relevant to a discography?
 * Disturbed not recorded this live album alone.
 * I think you can remove all the refs for the chart positions and certifications from the lead, since everything is there in the tables.
 * Better not.
 * Why are Allmusic, iTunes Store and MTV italicised in the references? Websites and TV channels aren't supposed to be.
 * Because the "publisher" parameters are used for the publication companies (e.g. Macrovision for Allmusic), the "work" parameter has to be used for these websites and TV channels. Hence, the italics. Having said that, I don't think "MTV Networks" is necessary in the MTV references. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:56, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * What makes zobbel.de a reliable source? indopug (talk) 16:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Bibliography of Chartography  C  anniba loki  18:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.