Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Echo & the Bunnymen discography


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 06:14, 22 June 2008.

Echo & the Bunnymen discography
Having finished a lot of work on this article I beleive it meets the criteria to be a Featured List. If anyone has any concerns I'll do my best to address them. --JD554 (talk) 19:52, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Weak Support I'm still a little uncomfortable with the lack of directors for a few of the music videos, and I still have reservations with the notes column in the Extended plays table, but everything else is in good-shape. Drewcifer (talk) 14:13, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Comments


 * En dashes for places like "(#828 905-2)" between two numbers per WP:DASH (there are more, this is only an example)
 * There's no disjuntion between those numbers: As per WP:DASH there is no "sense of to or through" with those numbers, nor is it a "substitute for some uses of and, to or versus". A hyphen is the correct form a dash to use here. --JD554 (talk) 06:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * "Essential Music Videos: 80's UK" &rarr; "Essential Music Videos: '80s UK"?
 * Fixed --JD554 (talk) 06:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Gary King ( talk ) 23:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Comment: Like I said in the PR, I don't think the lead quite works yet; you have sentences like "Their first single to reach the UK Singles Chart was their second single" and that Crocodiles is their debut album is mentioned twice. Further, considering that this is the lead to a discography, too much weight is placed on line-ups. Nothing to worry about though because, the lead for the Echo & the Bunnymen article is perfect for the discography! Simply copy and paste ... and rewrite the band article's lead :D indopug (talk) 18:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm, not bad is it? Done --JD554 (talk) 20:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Per WP:REUSE may I suggest that the copy/paste edit is reverted, then redone, using the edit summary to attribute the copied text to the article it came from, and the author(s) (the first editor of the article and the most recent will suffice). Matthewedwards (talk· contribs· count· email) 06:46, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Surely that only applies to using Wikipedia content outside of Wikipedia? I can't believe you need to attribute within the same publication. There is nothing on that page you cite to suggest this is necessary. --JD554 (talk) 08:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure this guideline only applies to reusing Wikipedia material outside of the website, and not in regards to copying text from one Wiki article and moving it into another Wikipedia article. WesleyDodds (talk) 04:18, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Its GFDL-related. I've found that the GFDL requires lots of weird counter-intuitive things. indopug (talk) 08:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It doesn't make sense. Material is shuffled among pages all the time, and I've never seen the original authors credited, partly because the collaboraive nature of Wikipedia makes it impossible and pointless to try and determine that. WP:REUSE is specifically referring to mirror sites and sites that duplicate Wikipedia entries, not moving text from article to article. WesleyDodds (talk) 11:54, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Support indopug (talk) 02:18, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

That's all I have The Rambling Man (talk) 17:01, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments from
 * "lineup" or "line-up"?
 * Fixed
 * Why semi-colons in the list of labels?
 * That's standard in a list that aleady contains commas. See or
 * Cool. Live and learn, eh?  The Rambling Man (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * "A second album" - "Their second album"?
 * Fixed
 * "culminated with" - I usually say "culminated in" (that may be personal pref but Webster examples agree)...
 * The OED and wiktionary allows either
 * "with the top 10 hit" Top 10 hit? and where?
 * Fixed
 * Formats - you have "Double 7-inch..." but "cassette" - consistent capitalisation.
 * Fixed
 * Notes, when sentence fragments, shouldn't take a full stop - irrespective of this you have inconsistent full stopping...
 * Fixed
 * For the Other album appearances, the notes make interesting reading but are they citable?
 * As albums, videos etc are self-referential, I could leave the citations they are, remove them or add a citation to the album, video etc which doesn't have an internet link. Which would you suggest? --JD554 (talk) 20:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, a common trait amongst the discog lists, the "self-referential" shout. I think I'm happy to accept most non-controversial claims but perhaps things like the typo issue, that could be cited.  Case by case basis... The Rambling Man (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Citation added.--JD554 (talk) 20:45, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.