Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Ed, Edd n Eddy (season 1)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by Khanassassin 16:14, 2 June 2012.

Ed, Edd n Eddy (season 1)

 * Nominator(s): Khanassassin ☪ 12:13, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel the article meets the criteria. :) Khanassassin ☪ 12:13, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Strong oppose – At Featured list candidates/List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes/archive1, another FLC you initiated, I noticed instances of plagarism from articles not used as sources. Well, I've been looking around and found more problems in this list. I'm not checking any more for now. It's frustrating to me that after what happened at the previous FLC linked above, more such instances of plagarism were found. I'm starting to wonder if there's an issue here that needs to be addressed in a different venue than FLC. Either way, this fails the requirements and should quickly be archived, unless there's a very good reason why the content matches what's in the links. Giants2008 ( Talk ) 20:19, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Episode 4: "When sifting through the treasures lurking up in Eddy's attic" is ripped from here.
 * Episode 5: "Sarah falls in love with Edd and begins to pursue him..." is from here.
 * Episode 6: "Edd receives a psycology manual in the mail" is from here.
 * Let me add that the problem that needs addressing isn't necessarily yours. I noticed that the problematic content was in the episodes list well before you joined Wikipedia, so the plagarism didn't come from you. That said, splitting all of the content from the original list into this one without rewriting anything may not have been the best idea, knowing what had been found at the episodes FLC. It would have been better if you had re-writen everything there, and then the problems would have been solved. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 00:43, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, I re-wrote the summaries now. I hope the problem's solved. --Khanassassin ☪ 13:16, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not convinced that changing some words around here and there is enough to fix the underlying structural issue and would have been happier if all of the summaries had been rewritten from scratch. Let's see if anyone else has something to add. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 21:04, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I withdraw this nomination. --Khanassassin ☪ 16:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.