Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/England cricket team Test results (1946–1959)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC).

England cricket team Test results (1946–1959)

 * Nominator(s): Harrias  talk 10:27, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

The next in the series of these, this follows the same format as the FLs England cricket team Test results (1877–1914) and England cricket team Test results (1920–1939). I have hopefully applied all the comments and feedback from those lists into this one, but I'm sure you'll all find plenty to bring up nevertheless! I do have an open nomination, Featured list candidates/Laureus World Sports Award for Sportsperson of the Year with a Disability/archive1, but that has two votes of support and no outstanding comments. Harrias talk 10:27, 24 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Support – Completely forgot about this one. Sorry about that. I offer my support now. Great job ! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 21:10, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Note Sorry, as I've noted elsewhere, home-life has kept me pretty busy lately, but I think we're over the hill now. Got family around for Christmas, but I'm hoping to get some time soon to address these issues, and hope the delegates can be patient with me. Thanks. Harrias  talk 12:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Replied to both and 's concerns.  Harrias  talk 15:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * couple of follow-ups... The Rambling Man (talk) 19:27, 19 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Support Great job, looking forward to see to rest of the series here at FLC. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:14, 14 January 2018 (UTC)


 * In the tiniest of nit-picks, I appear to need a subscription to read ref 5. Courcelles (talk) 05:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * As appears to be on a short wiki-break, I've just added the tag myself and can support this one.  Sourcing looks good. Courcelles (talk) 14:31, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Harrias  talk 17:01, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Source review passed; promoting. -- Pres N  16:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.