Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grade I listed churches in Lancashire/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 03:07, 15 December 2012.

Grade I listed churches in Lancashire

 * Nominator(s): Peter I. Vardy (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it is the next in a series of lists, by county, of Grade I listed churches. It follows closely the format of three previous successful nominations, the last being Grade I listed churches in Merseyside. The text has been copyedited, and there is a linked article about every church in the list. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 10:55, 1 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Support TBrandley 00:25, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks — especially for accepting our "differences". --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 08:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Support a very good list indeed, and one which should be thought of as a good current template for such lists. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:43, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Comments Only issue I could find, great work. NapHit (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * "Paley and Sharpe" perhaps use their full names on first use?
 * Did you mean "Paley and Austin"? The problem with this is that, as the list is sortable, there is no "first use".  And there were two Paleys, and two Austins at different times.  The links take you to the complex but precise part of the Sharpe, Paley and Austin article, which deals with the relevant phases of the practice (which existed for more than 100years!). --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 18:22, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, as it seems this is more complex than it first appeared, I'm for it to remain this way. As see no other issues and believe the list meets the criteria, I Support. NapHit (talk) 19:32, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 08:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Grade I support. You make it look so easy, but an awful lot of work has clearly gone into all of this. BencherliteTalk 20:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Support An interesting, well researched and comprehensive list and the perfect complement to other Lists of Grade I listed churches.J3Mrs (talk) 12:53, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Support based on these small changes and the one below.  Hassocks  5489 (Floreat Hova!)  20:49, 13 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Lead says "and a part of West Yorkshire was transferred into the county" – West Yorkshire did not exist until 1974 so nothing could be transferred, probably you should refer to the West Riding of Yorkshire which existed before 1974. Keith D (talk) 14:25, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Nice one! Thanks; corrected. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 17:25, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Support' Thanks for the change. Look forward to some more of these lists. Keith D (talk) 21:40, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.