Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best Metal Performance/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 02:18, 11 July 2010.

Grammy Award for Best Metal Performance

 * Nominator(s): Another Believer  ( Talk ) 16:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC) and --  C  anniba  loki  13:37, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets FL criteria and closely resembles other Grammy-related featured lists I have successfully nominated (Best Alternative Music Album, Best Male Rock Vocal Performance, Best Traditional Pop Vocal Album). I realize another Grammy-related list is currently being examined by reviewers, but most of the concerns have been addressed and the list has received support from multiple reviewers, so I thought it was appropriate to nominate another list (and I have other lists waiting as well). Thanks again to reviewers for taking the time to offer suggestions! Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Do we need to know that the New York Times is printed by the New York Times Company, et.al.? The Boston Globe perhaps, but it's almost as repetitive as saying that the New York Times is published in New York. --Golbez (talk) 22:33, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I always felt it was most appropriate to include as much reference information as possible. If you feel strongly about not including the name of the publisher, or if another reviewer agrees with you, I'd be happy to remove it. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I saw it asked for on the FAC for Anna Wintour so it seems to be something people care about. It seems purely redundant in cases like the New York Times, Seattle Times, Washington Post, etc... I mean, if you're going to include 'as much as possible' you'd better include the cities as well... but I somehow think that won't improve anyone's ability to look up the citation. :P --Golbez (talk) 05:49, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I removed the publisher information for The New York Times and The Seattle Times, as requested. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Another nice list.  Jujutacular  T · C 23:45, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Support – Looks good to me. Might be worth checking whether the Chicago Tribune articles can be found freely online here, but nothing is wrong with those sources as is, so it's nothing to withhold support over.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 21:24, 2 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Support - Everything looks great! WereWolf (talk) 17:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.