Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best Reggae Album/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 23:51, 27 January 2011.

Grammy Award for Best Reggae Album

 * Nominator(s): Another Believer  ( Talk ) 18:03, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets all FL criteria and closely resembles the other Grammy-related lists that I have promoted to FL status. Thanks, reviewers! Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:03, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Dab/EL check - There is a dab link and two dead links in the article. GamerPro64 (talk) 18:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * No disambig links. Working on replacing dead links... Thanks! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:51, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Replaced dead links. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:16, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Support-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:11, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Support All my queries have been addressed. Adabow (talk · contribs) 00:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Support per normal, a great list, a really enthusiastic nominator prepared to listen to advice and act on criticism. Exactly the stuff we want at FLC.  The Rambling Man (talk) 22:55, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your kind words. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment Since it is a sortable table, "Mind Control – Acoustic" ought to be linked somewhere, even if that's a redlink at the moment. Courcelles 21:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I imagine that details about the album could/would be merged with the existing Mind Control article. Any opposition to linking to the existing article? Should someone choose to create a separate article for the acoustic album in the future, they could certainly update the list. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:25, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * No objections to that, though my curiosity would like to know how an acoustic version of a prior winning album was able to be 51% new and win the award again... but I might be going into stuff that sources just didn't care about there. Courcelles 21:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Perhaps in the sense that the tracks are new recordings, not necessarily of original material. I imagine there are other award-winning albums out there consisting of cover songs that have been newly-recorded. -- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 21:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.