Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best Spoken Word Album for Children/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 22:04, 18 November 2011.

Grammy Award for Best Spoken Word Album for Children

 * Nominator(s): Albacore (talk) 00:34, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Taking a break from the team records articles, those are becoming tedious. Only real issue I can see with this list is that not all the year references offer producers/personnel for the nominees. Thoughts on this would be nice. Other nominee has "significant" (two) supports and no outstanding comments. Albacore (talk) 00:34, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Support Page looks good. Jimknut (talk) 20:03, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Support with one caveat: It seems odd to have the images end so soon. Are there any other images you could add so that they can be seen while reading the whole list?  R uby  comment!  18:44, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Added another image. On my viewing platform the photos are above the table, so I hope this addresses the concern. Albacore (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Comment: I'd recommend alphabetizing the Nominees column by artist's last name. For example, the order for 1994 would be Cleese, Grover, Sesame, Various artists, etc. In the Performing artist(s) column, I do not believe the sort name template is necessary for all names where multiple occur (the template is only needed for the first name; others can follow without using the template). For example, for 2000 only Greene would need the sortname template. Other reviewers, feel free to correct me this I am wrong. I made a few edits to the list, mostly to make it consistent with other Grammy-related FLs. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:57, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The "Nominees" column is sorted by the title of the work. Does it matter which way it's sorted (i.e what's the benefit from sorting the column by the performer's last lame)? As for the sort names, leaving them there, to my knowledge, doesn't hurt the sortability of the table. Albacore (talk) 23:50, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * OK. I suppose just for the sake of consistency, as all other (to the best of my knowledge) Grammy-related FLs are sorted by artist name in the Nominees column. As for the name sorting, it seems to me having a sort template is unnecessary if it is nonfunctional. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:12, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Ordered the nominees by last name. Albacore (talk) 14:12, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I removed the unnecessary sortname templates and support this promotion of this list, assuming all other reviewers' concerns are addressed. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:33, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.