Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/HMV's Poll of Polls/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by 20:18, 12 February 2013.

HMV's Poll of Polls

 * Nominator(s): A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 04:34, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel that it is of sufficient quality. I believe that this article meets the necessary FL criteria, and I welcome any comments about ways in which it could be improved. Thanks very much! A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 04:34, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Support All good: nice work! - SchroCat (talk) 14:45, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

A few minor comments
 * I would remove the redirect (HMV -> HMV )
 * Okay. But why?
 * The redirect might get turned into a dab page somewhere down the road. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:46, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair enough then. Done. A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 21:40, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Just so I understand it, currently the list is compiled from 30 sources, but in the past this number has included 60? This might be made a little clear in the lead.  Ruby  2010/  2013  01:26, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's a little confusing. From what I can tell, the poll has only ever been compiled each year using about 30-35 sources, but obviously over the years the sources have changed. As of last year, more than 60 different listings have, at some point, contributed towards the Poll of Polls. Which part of the lead do you think needs to be changed to make this clearer?
 * Thank you very much for the review, Ruby! A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 19:40, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Support I see no reason why this list should be barred from promotion. Prose is good and the content seems solid.  Ruby  2010/  2013  19:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Support on prose and images, looks like a good list. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:58, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.