Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Hi-5 discography/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2017 (UTC).

Hi-5 discography

 * Nominator(s): SatDis (talk) 11:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because Hi-5 is a very popular musical group in Australia and they have been prominent in the charts since 1999. I think there is a lot of interesting information to tackle, and therefore I think the article could easily be worked to be listed as a feature list. SatDis (talk) 11:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Good job with the list. Once my comments are addressed, I will support this. If possible, could you possible review my FLC for Alyssa Milano discography? I know it is a busy time of the year, so I understand if you do not have the time or interest of doing this. Let me know if you have any questions about my comments. Aoba47 (talk) 18:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Comments from Aoba47
 * Would you define Hi-5 as a "pop music group"? I know that the primary genres listed on the group's main page are children's and edutainment, but there are several references in the body of the same article referring to its material as pop music. I am only asking this as I was wondering if this should be categorized using Category:Pop music group discographies?
 * In the Infobox box image, you should identify where they are performing. I would revised the caption to say something along the lines of "The original members of Hi-5 performing in concert in Wellington, New Zealand in 2006". You can keep the member's names in parenthesis as it is helpful for an unfamiliar reader.
 * Add "the" in front of the Australian Recording Industry Association in the first paragraph of the lead.
 * I would encourage you to sell out the word number rather than abbreviate as No. for a more formal and appropriate tone for the site.
 * You use a few repetitive sentence structures in the lead and I would suggest adding variety. For instance, the two sentences about the release of "It's a Party" starts with the similar phrase "The album was..."
 * I am not a fan of how the release dates for same albums are placed in parenthesis after the title and others are put in the text. Be consistent one way or the other for all of them.
 * I would suggest combining the last two paragraphs as they are rather short.
 * The second sentence in the lead's third paragraph reads rather awkwardly as it quickly jumps from one idea to the next without a transition or flow. You want this to be a strong narrative documenting the group's releases so avoid making the lead sound like it is jumping around or listing ideas.
 * Revise the last sentence in the lead's third paragraph. "a which was a record at the time" is not grammatically correct and needs to be redone. I get the idea, but the wording needs to be improved.
 * Remove "most recently" in the two instances you use it as it is unnecessary when you give the date.
 * I do not believe the (sales thresholds) is necessary in the charts. I have never seen it used in a FL for an artist's discography.
 * iTunes Store should not be italicized in the references.
 * I would describe them as a pop group for children, yes. I've added the category. I also might add Pop to the main page.
 * I've added Wellington. For the main page I was advised to keep it succinct, hence why the location wasn't included.
 * I guess the (sales threshold) was there for reference, but I've removed it now.
 * All phrasing issues and other comments addressed.
 * Thankyou for your feeback, I myself don't feel qualified enough to take a look at your page but I definitely will have a go at leaving feedback when I get the chance. SatDis (talk) 01:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Support this nomination. Wonderful job with this list! Aoba47 (talk) 02:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Support. Great job SatDis. Keep up the great work! Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 12:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Comments – Just a couple of small issues to report from my look at the list.
 * The lead has a few "also"s, which are usually redundant in nature. See if you can trim a couple of them.
 * Note d: Minor, but the comma should probably be a semi-colon instead. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 03:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thankyou for your comments. They have been addressed. SatDis (talk) 03:36, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Support – My couple of comments have been resolved and the list looks to meet FL standards. Nice job here. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 23:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi, the bot has not closed the nomination page and added the star yet; when should I expect this might happen? Thankyou for the promotion of the article. SatDis (talk) 10:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't know why the 'bot hasn't done that. Sorry, we'll need to look into it. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I appreciate it! SatDis (talk) 10:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.