Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Hugo Award for Best Fanzine/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 02:31, 22 October 2010.

Hugo Award for Best Fanzine

 * Nominator(s):  Pres N  19:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Back again, with the Hugo Award for Best Novel  Novella  Novelette  Short Story  Related Work  Professional Magazine  Semiprozine  Fanzine, the category for fan, or non-professional, magazines. As always, comments from previous FLCs have been incorporated into this list. This looks to be my last one for a while as well as the last magazine Hugo award article- I've been really busy in real life, and I've run out of the buffer I'd built up. Thanks for reviewing! -- Pres N  19:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Support Courcelles 02:52, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Support - Issues are resolved to my satisfaction. --Dan Dassow (talk) 10:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Support: Looking at the list and seeing all of the resolved comments, I think that it passes FL criteria. GamerPro64 (talk) 19:49, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * oppose, the table(s) in this article do not meet the requirements of WP:MOS. If you look at WP:Wikitable you'll see that tables are required to use  --  Lil_℧niquℇ №1  &#124;  talk2me  18:49, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Ummm... what? The page you linked to is about how to make a table with Wikicode. It's not a guideline or even a suggestion, it's a help manual. I actually don't think I've ever seen a wikitable that used "scope="col"" or whatever, and it's certainly not a requirement. -- Pres N  19:15, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologies that's my fault. I should have directed you to WP:ACCESS. It is part of MoS but because people are not that aware of it there is some opposition to it. So again sorry if it was confusing. I linked to the help page because it shows how wikitables should be programmed. They are being slowly implemented e.g. Rihanna discography --  Lil_℧niquℇ №1 &#124;  talk2me  22:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * So... Basically one/a few people came up with a way to code wikitables that works out to better html (A good thing), and with no real discussion they then by fiat put it in the MOS. And now I'm supposed to spend a few hours rewriting the tables in all of my FLs in order to get the exact same visual output? While even you, who seems to be the only supporter of it in these FLCs that I see, admits that as soon as people actually found out about it there was opposition? I'm not feeling well right now so I might be a bit rude here, but I think I'll pass on this. Go back to WP:ACCESS and tell them to get a bot to run through all of the hundreds of thousands of tables on WP, rather than making people do manual drudge work on a few hundred FLs. -- Pres N  22:59, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, at Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates you said that you were going to retract your comments at all of the FLCs, so I'm just going to assume that you forgot this one. -- Pres N  23:26, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.